IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc4971bis-00.txt

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 October 2015 05:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD001A88B2 for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UwvdWwBRwblP for <isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30A5E1A88AB for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ioiz6 with SMTP id z6so46412129ioi.2 for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=iebuDwP/sM5xRln6dvznFQhKHJL8sCeneYwf2EuYS28=; b=iaXZV14PY+unMWVCGrgh7cHyx0hi0PX6UxGX/IujAVFfZU1GndeOpEY1xXp3lW8/Wc i9nQYeS+dUpJ1WCO4ONZIep6nuMqpQBGYq0+6wss9LZOutrKPawbjA1c8oDqaHphu4Nu 5u7CkDFCTc0vWU7AfjY6kAD08pe93dT2P/fOaFkP0eZA9a86WwdPZYz7obsxsyKKk1q8 q1qm6yEUkSL8p1YfKdqJq4LQrNINUXm1jmPz5sXwFv6FP0MkLG1kw5xHSnOfX6R9i4Yc 3OX3u6SAmQQ/JRIJ5UaPMuUWSLJNZufYy0C/xmMZU3HWrTCSv3xIgB87QQzvcnGi/ZC4 YGxg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.16.158 with SMTP id 30mr6449863ioq.50.1444282144596; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.27.195 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hMR2zz6iZFvk+tDw7EF4J4g_JfGSftWcnBvO4Gzg4xeFg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151008035854.31741.17926.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <d0010681b7f64c74b2b8cdc07174bdfd@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <CA+wi2hOLsu_rTE70yMaptELb9kDCkO2vQ_UwV+TBQ693CcZg_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hMR2zz6iZFvk+tDw7EF4J4g_JfGSftWcnBvO4Gzg4xeFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:29:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hPjcf0CYYzyJdaaHMSgta1DBV6F7w8sLSx+3u4ah8r45g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ed8d82f26720521912400"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/upPHgmFntTHoYvAAMr--NVidJFw>
Cc: ISIS-WG <isis-wg@ietf.org>, "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ginsberg-isis-rfc4971bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 05:29:06 -0000

I had a strong 'deja-vu' that was bothering me and realized after reading
announcement carefully it's just update on RFC4971 and not a new router CAP
;-)  so my b) comment is kind of couple years behind ;-) but still valid
...

--- tony

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> though it does not _see_ a L1/L2 ...  sorry for omission ...
>
> --- tony
>
>


-- 
*We’ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
that is not true.*
—Robert Wilensky

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email