IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isis-wg] Jari Arkko's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10: (with DISCUSS)

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 05 May 2016 00:54 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3EB12D971; Wed, 4 May 2016 17:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z1bBHceuozeI; Wed, 4 May 2016 17:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CDA512D96E; Wed, 4 May 2016 17:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id x1so29458195obt.0; Wed, 04 May 2016 17:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=qOT8XnInp6091qDDKjnEyJ9L0bg6qbETdezE1MZRqBw=; b=k4zoBEAB2T/iJ/7dfRilpDHKl2SprteI5X3WxhsLVqwhijwaN++DZBxIDcCm6CIeBQ M8BfLwVBwt6XMoMSNDkUH7OCFgGzWq2v6oPNDnuxd4uilUao7JZb9jj74h1l9eVdVFc3 entfLvCljyrKzHcBDdG2HTwvoGPU1OQ0Uth2cqTL3mO1FI+n/TgR0Pc9wnzNuS07iled qWo/8e7zQsC9v+r/e/3D8OSbU6TLAQ4NeOJQob33D1/NvOKGeoe1YaRgIayt2ZmbYIiB j6TA38iDdH0NbdG6xj7frjOJP26EcUhe3KIIGHio5d5gimpfFOem9q0dfsOJU5JUER+b cuVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=qOT8XnInp6091qDDKjnEyJ9L0bg6qbETdezE1MZRqBw=; b=b3RptaP1Ev51K7vpkcLwFa7/ZvNgKWuu3r2YqR0FNTkfPGiW4+VeIEhmHAEg22GKl6 vWmdGC4eekZ791VtFKk4GGfjcfcFf7l1aE0mUu3cEtRY3P3ATmV0PNPyceFN0BGoYIES 3DSg5xUYkA4qRbSVZh0xml8YkdsWSK/WNEr4jKy7IWvL9yES7AUj4V48H6pI93LUiDMJ 6XHuexW590Zks8DLNjd+4+LRJEbyCSdDrbSTw6qu+a0izh0nEV/TbwJ8AfHuH6D/ujWB a9irSMfV9iZUpWBYmxViqsRYwi5QK9KK8um1XGfuEhdXDEUyVz6zjppurNLKnQ45BX1U FGfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FU1BQmDsgipRJsY4nQ1MKYDrAnzH7f3XSxuDiD3SMAbBRhPHAPEagATLgt2buN57fou42ofdZBEaKvQfw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.165.99 with SMTP id yx3mr5943872obb.20.1462409695805; Wed, 04 May 2016 17:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.115.168 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2016 17:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7C86D5FC-13CC-4F49-9D4C-D91CA79DD9F0@piuha.net>
References: <20160504211229.8272.67553.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAG4d1re1uNPV=HnpFTToG27kr_OoYKmhzunDWYBMSnLetmkaCg@mail.gmail.com> <3a2f71ba6861400c8e556231e5e2f11d@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <CAG4d1rcroAaupCzp0p9HfnP=wqf=tap-wLxZkqB0xVmauHQZZg@mail.gmail.com> <658ac2cbc94c4f6b8ccc13770eeebb39@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <7C86D5FC-13CC-4F49-9D4C-D91CA79DD9F0@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 20:54:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rc_tDnBKRiS3m5jeEBfnd82vrGFYig3iz1HM46rV8+FEg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2ea6a6f4f5c05320dca9f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/y-kT-WWhZyGaUCkjmygkw1JSZzc>
Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag@ietf.org>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "isis-chairs@ietf.org" <isis-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Jari Arkko's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 00:54:58 -0000

Les,

I also like this wording.  It's definitely an improvement.
Thanks for your help!  Let's see what the authors say as well.

Regards,
Alia

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:

>
> > How about replacing the second paragraph of Section 4.2 with:
> >
> > “Node administrative tags are expected to be associated with a stable
> > attribute. In particular, node administrative tags MUST NOT be associated
> > with something whose state can oscillate frequently e.g., the
> reachability
> > to a specific destination.
> >
> > While no specific limit on the number of node administrative tags which
> > may be advertised is defined, it is expected that only a modest number
> > of tags will be required in any deployment.”
> >
>
> I’d find this an improvement, i.e., in particular more informative.
>
> Jari
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email