IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Isms] Interoperability report: 5343

Robert Story <Robert.Story@cobham.com> Thu, 23 December 2010 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <Robert.Story@cobham.com>
X-Original-To: isms@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isms@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CDC3A67DA for <isms@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:50:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.302, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7csuAuCkqahW for <isms@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5411C3A67D7 for <isms@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 06:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id oBNEqROX028184; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:52:27 -0600
Received: from mailbin2.ads.sparta.com (mailbin.sparta.com [157.185.85.6]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBNEqRk6013155; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:52:27 -0600
Received: from sparta.com ([216.27.162.138]) by mailbin2.ads.sparta.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:52:26 -0500
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:52:22 -0500
From: Robert Story <Robert.Story@cobham.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Message-ID: <20101223095222.46c1bb65@sparta.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101223085450.GA37184@elstar.local>
References: <20101220092735.5faa804d@sparta.com> <20101223085450.GA37184@elstar.local>
Organization: SPARTA
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Sig_/JlsVHlbCxrI9=EFcIO=_Plk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Dec 2010 14:52:26.0798 (UTC) FILETIME=[03DDF4E0:01CBA2B1]
Cc: isms@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isms] Interoperability report: 5343
X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:50:28 -0000

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:54:50 +0100 Juergen wrote:
JS> Due to the MUST language, the text reads like a quote from RFC 5343,
JS> but it seems this is a suggestion for a clarification to be added to
JS> RFC 5343.

Juergen,

No, it's a quote from 3.1. Appendix A lists the requirements (using RFC
2119 keywords) that were not directly testable.

-- 
Robert Story
Senior Software Engineer
SPARTA (dba Cobham Analytic Soloutions)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email