[Isms] advancement of RFCs 5343, 5590, 5591, 5953 to Draft Standard

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Thu, 23 December 2010 09:20 UTC

Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:22:17 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: isms@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20101223092217.GB37334@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: isms@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: [Isms] advancement of RFCs 5343, 5590, 5591, 5953 to Draft Standard
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>

Hi,

Robert has posted interoperability reports for the RFCs 5343, 5590,
5591, 5953. I like to ask the WG to review the reports and provide
feedback. My understanding so far is that the implementors did not
uncover any major problems in the RFCs and that a status change from
Proposed to Draft seems feasible without a re-publication of the
documents. Please comment if you believe my reading is incorrect and
you think a re-publication is necessary.

According to Section 6.2 of RFC 2026, we can't advance RFC 5953 before
February (RFC 5953 was published in August and a specification shall
remain at the Proposed Standard level for at least six (6) months) and
as such there is about a months left for additional input. If others
are working on implementations of one or more of these RFCs, please
consider getting in contact with Robert or the working group or the
chairs so that we can make the case for moving to Draft status even
stronger.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

Re: [Isms] Ismsadvancement of RFCs 5343, 5590, 55… Wes Hardaker
Re: [Isms] Ismsadvancement of RFCs 5343, 5590, 55… Sean Turner
[Isms] advancement of RFCs 5343, 5590, 5591, 5953… Juergen Schoenwaelder