Re: [Isms] charter proposal

"Tom Petch" <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com> Fri, 12 August 2005 20:41 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E3gKv-0001OQ-60; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:41:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E3gKt-0001N9-47 for isms@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:41:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA00453 for <isms@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:40:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from galaxy.systems.pipex.net ([62.241.162.31]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3gtR-0001Fd-9X for isms@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:16:46 -0400
Received: from pc6 (1Cust57.tnt27.lnd4.gbr.da.uu.net [62.188.154.57]) by galaxy.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CCB46E0001F0; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:40:45 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <04c901c59f75$8bf4e680$0601a8c0@pc6>
From: Tom Petch <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com>
To: "Blumenthal, Uri" <uri.blumenthal@intel.com>
References: <3DEC199BD7489643817ECA151F7C592901A5EB50@pysmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Isms] charter proposal
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:38:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: isms@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: isms@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Tom Petch <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com>
List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/isms>
List-Post: <mailto:isms@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: isms-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: isms-bounces@lists.ietf.org

<inline>
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Blumenthal, Uri" <uri.blumenthal@intel.com>
To: <ietfdbh@comcast.net>; "Kaushik Narayan" <kaushik@cisco.com>
Cc: <isms@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 1:26 AM
Subject: RE: [Isms] charter proposal


I'm surprised to see SSH or TLS called "infrastructure".

    A. In case of SSH the infrastructure is local accounts.


A clarification, if you will.  Are you saying that user-authentication (ie
client) is performed by passwords over a encrypted channel (as opposed to
publickey or hostbased, the other two options listed in
draft-ietf-secsh-userauth-27.txt).

Tom Petch
<snip>


_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms