IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-12

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Sun, 04 February 2018 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1FF127077 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 08:10:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mqZI2RutY3V5 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 08:10:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE12E1271FD for <its@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 08:10:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id w14GAW3v046369 for <its@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:10:32 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 4192520147D for <its@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:10:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F086200FF1 for <its@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:10:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [132.166.84.126] ([132.166.84.126]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id w14GAV2l026066 for <its@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:10:32 +0100
To: its@ietf.org
References: <1517217856.4315.32.camel@it.uc3m.es>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <330dcee5-163a-32e0-d99d-34a2cd3fa03e@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 17:10:31 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1517217856.4315.32.camel@it.uc3m.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/3oR9chw_LuMpCl4ByiOniEgwKQ0>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-12
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 16:10:36 -0000


Le 29/01/2018 à 10:24, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano a écrit :
[...]

> - The use of MAY (to be interpreted as in RFC2119) in the terminology
> section does not seem appropriate to me. I don't think normative text
> applies to whether an OBRU may be ab IP router.

Following suggestions I propose we use "IP-OBU" instead of OBRU, and 
remove the MAY, if you do not mind.

Alex

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status