Re: [ipwave] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-12 - Normative text in Ethernet Adaptation Layer

"Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com> Fri, 16 February 2018 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <surfer@mauigateway.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FADD126CD6 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:04:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A-4Lz_rphK7z for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:04:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imta-38.everyone.net (imta-36.everyone.net [216.200.145.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7BB31243F3 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:04:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (omta002.sj2.proofpoint.com [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1G30rWh024487 for <its@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:04:06 -0800
X-Eon-Originating-Account: oX42crMyCqsjuOVh4uoDAAuS1gN3KR-k7t_1Sl-3AndEKWXV5OgmcZateMoxg8fV
X-Eon-Dm: m0116954.ppops.net
Received: by m0117458.mta.everyone.net (EON-PICKUP) id m0117458.5a81d01c.63d7; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:04:06 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180215190401.8B15FFB2@m0117458.ppops.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:04:01 -0800
From: Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com>
Reply-To: surfer@mauigateway.com
To: its@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Eon-Sig: AQLAznNahkomxrLSIAEAAAAB,59f1c2d7ed38a3bae354402d003b8495
X-Originating-Ip: 74.87.40.2
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-02-16_01:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1802160031
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/6fKf0jdS-dajGEEz1hcRc3N-Nzs>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-12 - Normative text in Ethernet Adaptation Layer
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 03:04:08 -0000


--- abdussalambaryun@gmail.com wrote:
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>


:: Ethernet is wired network high speed and it is with 
:: very lower noise compared with wireless.

I would believe most everyone here understands this in 
great detail...


:: We should not forget mobility in our use case.

Isn't that what this list is about?

scott






--- abdussalambaryun@gmail.com wrote:

From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: its <its@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb@ietf.org, François Simon <fygsimon@gmail.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>, Richard Roy <dickroy@alum.mit.edu>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-12 - Normative text in Ethernet Adaptation Layer
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 03:22:00 +0200

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:32 PM, <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:

>
>
> On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Dick Roy <dickroy@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> *IMO you should stick to the network (and transport) layer, and let the
> DLL guys do their job.*
>
>
The problem is that their  job is not done, they are still amending to get
better performance (from ieee802.11p to ieee802.11px). IMO we can consider
performance when we transmit IPv6 over such job. Additionally, recommend
for better transmission quality.


>
> Just to be clear: the purpose of trying to provide an adaptation layer is
> so that we can simply reference RFC 2464 (and friends) "Transmission of
> IPv6 Packets over Ethernet Networks” and be done.
>

In wireless communication increasing frames header size decreases
performance. Using easy ways have always overheads. Ethernet is wired
network high speed and it is with very lower noise compared with wireless.
We should not forget mobility in our use case.

We need to reduce the overhead, and consider performance when transmitting
IPv6 over ieee802.11-ocb

AB


_______________________________________________
its mailing list
its@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its