IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ipwave] Question on actually using 11-OCB

Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com> Wed, 26 July 2023 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAAEC14CE38 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xw_ERkJ6_Vsc for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 695B2C151078 for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1FD625FC for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:33:25 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id OzB0n7Z2GAD9 for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:33:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [31.133.150.241] (dhcp-96f1.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.150.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9939E6256E for <its@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:33:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4151b8ca-ad03-985b-423e-81736e86edb2@htt-consult.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:33:49 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0
To: its@ietf.org
Content-Language: en-US
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/nqj75OvRv4z2NDnVT6RPeTyvWro>
Subject: [ipwave] Question on actually using 11-OCB
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 14:34:08 -0000

I am working with Uncrewed Aircraft System (UAS) manufacturers on A2A 
direct communication for Detect And Avoid (DAA).

See my draft:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moskowitz-drip-a2x-adhoc-session/

One of the perferred radio links for this is IEEE 802.11-OCB, but 
running over 2.4Ghz.  With channel 6 being mentioned the most.

So the challenge at first is what does this take to do?

Well I don't have 802.11-2020 but I do have 802.11p-2010.  It seems that 
all is needed is to set dot11OCBEnabled to true, and follow sec 11.19.  
No firmware hack needed as long as dot11OCBEnabled is available?

Has anyone had experience(s) with this they can share with me?

This would then be an important use of IPv6 over OCB; also leveraging 
SCHC as an Ethertype:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-schc-protocol-numbers/

thanks

Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email