IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] Higher bandwidth is a requirement, not a number to avoid

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 21 June 2019 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9F01201CE for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 02:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NoDKnBF2qs1U for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 02:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 791DE1201C7 for <its@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 02:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x5L9UHmR012265; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:30:17 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A4D45203387; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:30:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D2420330E; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:30:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x5L9UH5r012928; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:30:17 +0200
To: dickroy@alum.mit.edu, 'Jérôme Härri' <jerome.haerri@eurecom.fr>, 'John Kenney' <jkenney@us.toyota-itc.com>
Cc: 'its' <its@ietf.org>
References: <24309460-0172-60f1-f2e8-7cc57d152167@gmail.com> <00b601d521c6$7038a7a0$50a9f6e0$@eurecom.fr> <CAP6QOWQJwz9TFxhyaon4OMAjKHbjoqqpQKgkabU5GEWX38+n6Q@mail.gmail.com> <01de01d5276f$00911960$01b34c20$@eurecom.fr> <cf78903c-2fad-4203-f557-d613575e0ab7@gmail.com> <FAF38084B8CB4CD7A5B839173C68CADA@SRA6>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5776cb65-4194-60bf-ab6c-14d458f15c08@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 11:30:17 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <FAF38084B8CB4CD7A5B839173C68CADA@SRA6>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/q4wTNG-cc8_k6b4izcGoyRhVTic>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Higher bandwidth is a requirement, not a number to avoid
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:30:26 -0000


Le 20/06/2019 à 16:49, Dick Roy a écrit :
> -----Original Message-----
> From: its [mailto:its-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 7:13 AM
> To: Jérôme Härri; 'John Kenney'
> Cc: 'its'
> Subject: Re: [ipwave] Higher bandwidth is a requirement, not a number to 
> avoid
> 
> Le 20/06/2019 à 15:49, Jérôme Härri a écrit :
> 
> [...]
> 
>> as they do not really represent 
> 
>> what an automotive-grade ITS-G5/DSRC is really capable of doing.
> 
> What is the bandwidth of IPv6 demonstrated on ITS-G5/DSRC?
> 
> */[RR] IPV6 does not “have a bandwidth”.  The ITS-G5/DSRC access layers 
> currently have 10MHz (and 20MHz in the US)bandwidth channels specified 
> if that’s your question./*

What is the bandwidth afforded by an application using TCP/IPv6 on 
ITS-G5/DSRC?

Alex

> 
> Alex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> its mailing list
> 
> its@ietf.org
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email