Re: [its] charter ITS

Le 18/04/2016 17:22, Jong-Hyouk Lee a écrit :
> Hi Sri,
>
> Just one comment regarding IP prefix exchanges. Plz see inline.
> --
> Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
> Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
>
> #email: jonghyouk@gmail.com <mailto:jonghyouk@gmail.com>
> #webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon
>
>> On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:51 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
>> <sgundave@cisco.com <mailto:sgundave@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Alex – Inline ..
>>
>>
>>
>> To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com
>> <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>>
>> Cc: "its@ietf.org <mailto:its@ietf.org>" <its@ietf.org
>> <mailto:its@ietf.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [its] charter ITS - proposed work items
>>
>>
>> ITSers, We work on a more rigorous ITS charter text. Now we propose
>> four work items: 1. "Problem statement for IP in V2V and V2I"
>> including "IP addressing architecture for V2V and V2I" and including
>> "Gap Analysis: IP protocols suited and gaps" and including "Use-cases
>> for IP in V2V and V2I moving network to nearby moving or fixed network"
>> [Sri] Agree. This is a good starting point. Use-Cases document is
>> needed. On the Gap Analysis document, it should be stated as how the
>> gaps are captured and in relation to what technology. Is it NEMO,
>> MANET, some other protocols ?
>>
>> 2. "Threat Analysis for IP prefix exchanges in V2V and V2I context"
>> [Sri] If my starting point is #1, not sure how to read this ? Prefix
>> exchanges appears more like a solution. In MANET there is exchange of
>> prefixes, in NEMO we don’t inject those prefixes and so I do not know
>> if this work item is valid at this time.
>
> You are right. That is a missing part. We need to have a solution for
> "IP prefix exchanges in V2V and V2I” The need of IP prefix exchanges is
> clear and well presented in PS documents for IP in V2V and V2I. Then,
> there are 2 documents already existing as below:
>
> 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-petrescu-autoconf-ra-based-routing-00
> 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jhlee-mext-mnpp-00
>
> The above 2 documents are the early effort to establish IP direction
> communications between vehicles and also between a vehicle and a road
> side unit.
>
> I officially request that we should have a solution for IP prefix
> exchanges as a work item.

Noted.

Alex

>
> Cheers!
>>
>> 3. "IP over DSRC (802.11-OCB)" typical IP-over-foo document[*],
>> including connectivity in fast and asymmetric conditions, coverage
>> area vs speed diagrams, below-IP congestion management.
>>
>> 4. "List of papers and _products_ using IP in V2V and V2I"
>> [Sri] Not clear what the deliverable is.
>>
>> What do you think? Please respond by next Monday, April 18th.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> its mailing list
>> its@ietf.org <mailto:its@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>