Re: [iucg] IUser information

[JFC Morfin <[e-mail]>]

Dear Mykyta,
"Why provide comments on already published RFC?" Because RFC means 
request for comments.

I am afraid I was not clear enough. We have acquired experience. 
There was a user services area. Russ has accepted the IUCG list which 
is a new way to make users present and represented in the IETF. Our 
job is to find an adequate way to support the Internet (Engineering 
Task Force) User and their contribution. The way we explore has been 
opposed by Unicode, resulting in our distrust in the Unicode 
technical transparency and therefore adequacy for the Internet (until 
the growing influence of Google, the IETF trusted ISO 10646). As a 
result we have better defined the working method we think adequate.

Not only I do not oppose the IESG but I support its move. Up to us to 
imagine what to better do now if there is a better way than FYIs. 
Also, you certainly know that Unicode has made sure I cannot speak up 
on the IETF list.
Best
jfc


At 05:53 26/08/2011, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>25.08.2011 4:15, jefsey wrote:
>>3. Russ Hosley (IETF, Chair) puts an official end to the FYI 
>>sub-series of RFC destined, by the IETF user area to inform the public
>
>1. This was a decision of the whole IESG; note the draft's name 
>being draft-iesg-rfc1150bis.
>2. Conclusion of FYI seb-series had a formal reason only - absence 
>of user services area, which ceased to exist.  Considered that, and 
>the issue that RFC 1150 was clear regarding review of proposed FYIs 
>by user services area wg, I believe that such decision is fair.
>3. If you didn't want IESG to do so, you should have spoken up 
>during Last Call.
>4. If you didn't like IESG decision, you should have appealed as 
>discussed in RFC 2026.
>
>>
>>If you have any comment you are welcome.
>
>Why provide comments on already published RFC?  See bullet 3 above.
>
>M. Yevstifeyev
>_______________________________________________
>iucg mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg