[iucg] further to your response

[JFC Morfin <[e-mail]>]

Dear Russ,

I kept working a little bit (http://architf.org/" rel="nofollow">http://architf.org) on the consequences of your stern and neutral response to my appeal regarding RFC 6852 (http://www.iab.org/appeals/2013-2" rel="nofollow"> http://www.iab.org/appeals/2013-2). One never knows about the positive/negative impact of something in/on the future, so I have no comment. 

I only have now to complete my clarification endeavor in appealing the ISOC BoT against the IAB for disregarding its RFC 2850 mission and not providing guidance on a matter of importance for the Internet community and the JTC1 (/SC38, NWIP 881 - I suppose, I have not yet a copy of the US National Body Contribution). This will permit ISOC to formalize its position and complete the RFC 6852 text as far as the Internet nature and architecture are concerned in the architectonic debate.

I have looked around and I do not find any formal documentation on the ISOC appeal process. Could you, or Bob, help me with that information?

I thank you for this help. I apologize for disrupting your vacation, but I fear possible reglementary delays constraints and an ill timing with the ISOC and ICC strategies for the October 21, 2013 HLLM on the directly related global cyber ethic issues, as my interest is in a positive clarification and not in negative disruption.

Best regards
jfc morfin