Re: [Jcardcal] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 24 March 2014 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jcardcal@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE3E1A02F2; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3iufs0fd67B8; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B4C1A02C8; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF38BE57; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:42:34 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yQrnAyQ4Ceqv; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:42:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.12] (unknown [86.46.25.37]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69D13BE47; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:42:33 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <5330A6C9.7040103@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:42:33 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <20140324210114.12842.55998.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJLf14Mvjkqmb46DyPq5jhORiq_X_p4T28fxhHhKOcLRdw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLf14Mvjkqmb46DyPq5jhORiq_X_p4T28fxhHhKOcLRdw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jcardcal/YOITU1JrvX9QooB8rxpmVjPFwvA
Cc: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, jcardcal-chairs@tools.ietf.org, "jcardcal@ietf.org" <jcardcal@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Jcardcal] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: jcardcal@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON data formats for vCard and iCalendar WG <jcardcal.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jcardcal>, <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jcardcal/>
List-Post: <mailto:jcardcal@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jcardcal>, <mailto:jcardcal-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 21:42:38 -0000

Hiya,

On 03/24/2014 09:10 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> section 1: this is odd: "Extensions to the underlying
>> iCalendar specification must not lead to requiring an update
>> to jCal." How are you going to prevent that happening?  I
>> think the best you can do is point out how such an extension
>> could break jcal and recommend to not do that.
> 
> It's a lower-case "must not".  

Sure, I wasn't making a 2119 point though.

> What it's saying is that jCal is
> designed to accommodate extensions to iCalendar, without requiring
> changes to jCal.  It's not talking about changes that might show up in
> a new major iCalendar version... just changes that use the normal
> iCalendar extension mechanisms.

Yep. My comment is really that it'd be better to say
what to avoid doing in any future such RFCs instead of
just saying "You're not allowed to be naughty." But
just a comment, if you think its fine that's ok too.

S

> 
> Barry
>