[Jcardcal] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09: (with COMMENT)

["Stephen Farrell" <[e-mail]>]

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


section 1: this is odd: "Extensions to the underlying
iCalendar specification must not lead to requiring an update
to jCal." How are you going to prevent that happening?  I
think the best you can do is point out how such an extension
could break jcal and recommend to not do that.