Re: [Jcardcal] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09: (with COMMENT)

Thanks Alissa, I've fixed this locally, it will be part of the next draft.

Philipp

On 3/23/14, 6:40 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm good with this assuming the gen-art points and Barry's issues get
> resolved. One nit in section 3.5.2:
>
> "To ease processing in jCal, the value to such parameters
>    MUST be represented in an array containing the separated values."
>    
> I think this is supposed to say "of such parameters".
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jcardcal mailing list
> jcardcal@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jcardcal