[Jmap] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-sharing-08: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-jmap-sharing-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-sharing/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done, it seems like a useful document.

Nevertheless, some non-blocking comments:

- the abstract and contents present this I-D as a "data model" but, in my own
view, a data model does not include "methods" or actions. Suggest to augment
the abstract to also mention "methods" - even with a i18n section, section 2
allows for only one unknown-language version of "description" - section 1.5.1 I
wonder why the plural form is used in urn:ietf:params:jmap:principals as there
can be only one principal

Hope this helps improving the document.

-éric