Re: [Jmap] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-quotas-10: (with COMMENT)
rcordier@linagora.com Tue, 31 January 2023 07:29 UTC
Return-Path: <rcordier@linagora.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE38C14CEF9; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 23:29:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.693
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=linagora.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fs8JlMWyH9xp; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 23:29:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.linagora.com (smtp.linagora.com [54.36.8.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03971C14E514; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 23:29:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?Open?PaaS?SMTP?server?for?Linagora? (unknown [51.83.109.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.linagora.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 906CA3EE62; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 08:29:49 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=AjNm2+0EHe9sd70fpuIMjm73CF0Gp/qXyCuti0XhU0QO+vV1OfANUmrLBYGbJi16vvsHvo7psvo4T1Kf/badOQB/2tBr7QWO+yZiUltCfHXHtXFlTCjhBz6GWfslyfCsanAqflLcUiYPmE83ee5S9ctJdc04SGVtyiJ5miuh3F0qyu5vkvJ7+747UTOHOReeKBVPdK853w7iOMKK3Q8G22Oq/JlkOTM8rKVKLXa3H2OrEeyvsflDmzBICCtX/Z/oM/5SM5k8TwhTXfFOvOtB4m1S4YQkgBTdrKe+aZUmEDzRa36C+Uc926Fb2Vxz/eXipxqilD2xB6f96mrHNfhaXA==; s=smtpoutjames; d=linagora.com; v=1; bh=8JK4KJo6Sk9lw3cg46ygWDmA9PCsDMIH47buImnWnIo=; h=from : reply-to : subject : date : to : cc : resent-date : resent-from : resent-sender : resent-to : resent-cc : in-reply-to : references : list-id : list-help : list-unsubscribe : list-subscribe : list-post : list-owner : list-archive;
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 07:29:50 +0000
Message-ID: <27032158.64.1675150190008@212e230e4d2f>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-LINAGORA-Copy-Delivery-Done: 1
From: rcordier@linagora.com
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-jmap-quotas@ietf.org, jmap-chairs@ietf.org, jmap@ietf.org, brong@fastmailteam.com
Reply-To: rcordier@linagora.com
User-Agent: Team-Mail/0.5.2 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-=Part.1f2.d8e000d13cffb238.18606bb6359.47bf30d5b3b2cf4=-"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/BdNI-DSBf-5Fn888baw_a0jmobM>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-jmap-quotas-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 07:29:58 -0000
Hello John, Sorry for the late response and thank you for the review and feedback. I extended JMAP in the abstract as commented in the latest version 11 of the draft. Can see the fix here: https://github.com/jmapio/jmap/pull/376/commits/941646da6b2e66f7fae5a453a47d4726bb5f6189 Best regards, Rene. On Dec 15, 2022 5:48 AM, from John Scudder Via Datatracker John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-jmap-quotas-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-quotas/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for this document. Also thanks to the shepherd, Born Gondwana, for the clear and useful writeup. One request, please expand "JMAP" in the Abstract.
- [Jmap] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-… John Scudder via Datatracker
- Re: [Jmap] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-i… rcordier