IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Proposal: split sharing mechanism from JMAP Calendars spec

Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com> Tue, 15 December 2020 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <murch@fastmail.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4E63A1278 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:29:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.com header.b=WSQlk6OP; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=cew10mvi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oOquaN4Nw0PL for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:29:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8659E3A1275 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 09:29:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFA05C00CF for <jmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:35 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; s=fm1; bh=G1wXTxSA8sRvGy6WO0U7BlJHeTa U8wQO5qkO9OAJykQ=; b=WSQlk6OPs54JNzl7jZhYx2jPxfXHg9xrtM2Un+UKC9w 20DZj9OQPAfL+FZO9UJl461ddrKt2PTG4EpqIxjP3UDMLj08J+ZYobtCYKra8nkC vk2mj1hwkWmGdILnPHSc2ZbEcdZoYTlsVfF8L45wpZ6l8qT7Hk9Q8UthBIGObaEw OajHOG7PfEKa1+CGXInLtzZ9aYnQPfxCMbGN7YLxZUUl0ESHNk96U0KZp/mhhgNs KsFoyKA1TjEGk6LGhwrpg9hj6QYdnMGgfSZBsdGhfv4US+fyjVLZu0CrMkeNwomY bZ3Qljjxs9XTFTJaRvJmKkLLg0lTO4FOecjgcUAS6AQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=G1wXTx SA8sRvGy6WO0U7BlJHeTaU8wQO5qkO9OAJykQ=; b=cew10mviKlmi+doAbrDvGy 0BQszl7EuAj+DE27n9zD171VSVj0I+uG/qx3biVsVDBdbAUHtKAQ6VoDp3NtQ1ds TuHHryOgwP+vv6waCToT380dPD57dTR/BG/s9sg5HYVvr+3b4IswRRFtIe3jTFtQ aF0PQv4TZrQaTknW6lrU1NQedP9tWhX8gvcS5BYF6M9CXk8y9COKdY+mdQgHEuFl EhvuT5iGERiThy1G8VSHxTcFrqMcjzw1XznoNuRRa7fKSRsHhKelnLscHElH7GUF XHe/UC5gaIER8uP2vxMRaG12yH8AJcoIjGOsxxXywBuhpnPSsAuXWRni1KMZ8I9w ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:f_LYX_yQzeklpMf07X9gcmbHl2Zkm8n2VsGoqLz1uRBVfAM6o_-dFA> <xme:f_LYX3Q_D7U1SXjQoaPr6ozmAA9pB_I0E5vsLMBaJypyqJ-t3aqMnEbt2GbqE0lXX dsDooASB230RQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeltddguddtgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtsegrtd erredtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghnucfouhhrtghhihhsohhnuceomhhurhgthhesfhgr shhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekheevhfduleeufeduhfelle fffeeigeeguddvveekiefhvdeujeeffeejtdegfeenucfkphepjeegrdejjedrkeehrddv hedtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmh hurhgthhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:f_LYX5WU0NhQALI2bfL-fIrr6gN0oRIhRMOLk40DRmelLHar4S8ymA> <xmx:f_LYX5iNjCryUTUBUoFaPdpRtMJBSKE3HijADJ5-5olWNbWckExwtA> <xmx:f_LYXxCecvkLbqon2pOCMjTHwUR8C9BelUKXnMdeQUGmedy-xDNMfQ> <xmx:f_LYX0OfSNWljS7YO3rfBNSutt8uXPYYLHP7Q6gh7g5lFeuCxp3qZw>
Received: from [192.168.1.22] (cpe-74-77-85-250.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.85.250]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2009A24005C for <jmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:35 -0500 (EST)
To: jmap@ietf.org
References: <1e765f38-5a7a-4498-ab6a-8361671713f5@beta.fastmail.com>
From: Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com>
Message-ID: <1eaf6b07-bf9b-e363-d5a0-b326a7f11f9f@fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:29:34 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1e765f38-5a7a-4498-ab6a-8361671713f5@beta.fastmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------BB5934B7378E4157816EEF20"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/cKBG3JwhbZF-SUMzLG2di3h1mtU>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Proposal: split sharing mechanism from JMAP Calendars spec
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:29:38 -0000

On 12/15/20 1:01 AM, Neil Jenkins wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The JMAP Calendars draft-in-progress currently defines the 
> CalendarPrincipal and CalendarShareNotification data types under a 
> separate capability. Looking at it, I have come to the conclusion that 
> we should go a step further: drop "Calendar" from the names and split 
> them out into their own spec. These are really generic sharing 
> primitives that could then be referenced by the other specs — e.g. 
> calendars, tasks, mail sharing — to define how you share data of types 
> between entities within a system in a consistent way.
>
> Please reply with any comments, questions, objections, or agreement 
> with the proposal and I will write up a draft splitting out these data 
> types to propose for acceptance.
>

+1 to splitting


-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Senior Software Developer
Fastmail US LLC

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email