IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)

"Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com> Wed, 26 April 2017 23:45 UTC

Return-Path: <adrien@qbik.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10067126B71 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGhur07zT4Ya for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.qbik.com (smtp.qbik.com [122.56.26.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72535129487 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: From [192.168.1.146] (unverified [192.168.1.146]) by SMTP Server [192.168.1.3] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v9.0.5 (Build 5926)) with SMTP id <0001031402@smtp.qbik.com>; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:45:51 +1200
From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>
Cc: "jmap@ietf.org" <jmap@ietf.org>, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:45:52 +0000
Message-Id: <emec5a46dd-e67f-4337-9411-2555c90537ca@bodybag>
In-Reply-To: <DB7983DE-892D-433F-8FB6-5AAD531E8D59@fugue.com>
References: <em8b177018-4769-44ea-b033-90bd8155d11b@bodybag> <46F700A6-C2B1-488B-A8B4-6ACD45B03C31@oracle.com> <CFC38D13-0CB2-4ABF-9403-DF0F773314B7@fugue.com> <D35A79C2-3918-4BB7-B97D-D56CA7548DCD@oracle.com> <1493099769.3023399.955193288.6D0312CC@webmail.messagingengine.com> <33553450-82F4-4CB4-8679-C9F52D8A8839@oracle.com> <1493163974.4122214.956244160.6735E49C@webmail.messagingengine.com> <EDCC6149-9222-468E-A17B-DDBA88A52D95@oracle.com> <1493185260.709114.956477904.75CB343B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <B2FD4698-E783-4D15-BA4E-B637A070E6A9@oracle.com> <DB7983DE-892D-433F-8FB6-5AAD531E8D59@fugue.com>
Reply-To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
User-Agent: eM_Client/7.0.27943.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------=_MB36014651-0FE8-491B-BB87-05ACF633845B"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/lKe2tUME64PqHxMBBrkqCZz6_uM>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:45:57 -0000

------ Original Message ------
From: "Ted Lemon" <mellon@fugue.com>
To: "Chris Newman" <chris.newman@oracle.com>
Cc: "jmap@ietf.org" <jmap@ietf.org>; "Bron Gondwana" <brong@fastmail.fm>
Sent: 27/04/2017 7:09:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Jmap] simpler future release & unsend without outbox (was 
Re: Best vs Good enough - adoption of JMAP)

>On Apr 26, 2017, at 1:54 PM, Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com> 
>wrote:
>>I'll describe a model that achieves my goal (which is to provide the 
>>desired future release & unsend functionality without requiring the 
>>server to implement a storage model with combined mail store and mail 
>>queue semantics).
>>[...]
>
>This looks good to me, FWIW. :)
>

same
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email