IETF Logo Mail Archive

[JMAP] Status of JMAP Metadata, RefPlus and Mail Sharing drafts ahead of IETF 125

Mauro De Gennaro <mauro@stalw.art> Mon, 09 March 2026 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mauro@stalw.art>
X-Original-To: jmap@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: jmap@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E302C7146C2 for <jmap@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 11:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stalw.art header.b="cHmtCdsx"; dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=stalw.art header.b="IYm8Dmnf"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_pGx5X31-0B for <jmap@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 11:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.stalw.art (mail.stalw.art [135.181.195.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A87DC7146B2 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 11:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=202404r; d=stalw.art; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=To:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From; t=1773081810; bh=oZTd0w6rXFUlLt26r2Gaht7 yJvysOywZHVrJk4cYW9g=; b=cHmtCdsx8gUTvJu/iQOeiEixgHcJfOXzXQPzjU2lsT/+Ol7xk8 METOVN8u6VT+JoIGl5zx9B9HvbCNhVdgk/a3Wjnb2zGlrnRvRxKZrwdSKynags8qAqRlsfwlAlz G7W5cqR4RFPWr9OvGA8bXGa6n9w5aPeUwo3sx5QV4ScxiwgrdeRxjYuLuY2LbQ0lpjAMoBebqOD hfLsxPUP+utwB+TGQITQJv0o3fsEbCKo3oMPRxo3to1ZLhgG+YRXHvJ/0RWsiMqB1oIAw8/bbtj WpkADevqZrNpg78ATfyoVAQcWPMlEAhnV9DGYvxnaefVt941n4MYhZXGI5gFLq4Eaag==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; s=202404e; d=stalw.art; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=To:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From; t=1773081810; bh=oZTd0w6rXFUlLt26r2Gaht7 yJvysOywZHVrJk4cYW9g=; b=IYm8DmnfxKfCR5RPRYC+/TmHIsqIdy7oT/m+itygR/S+YH9Zf0 6vA0zrDT4eUZsqgAK/0VhhdQeXFa47p8uvAA==;
From: Mauro De Gennaro <mauro@stalw.art>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.21\))
Message-Id: <8397988B-24C5-42D7-BD1E-45CEDD009AC5@stalw.art>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 19:43:19 +0100
To: JMAP IETF <jmap@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.21)
Message-ID-Hash: GAEKAZCFQJCEDIZ457HXYNUIACU3WNN3
X-Message-ID-Hash: GAEKAZCFQJCEDIZ457HXYNUIACU3WNN3
X-MailFrom: mauro@stalw.art
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-jmap.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [JMAP] Status of JMAP Metadata, RefPlus and Mail Sharing drafts ahead of IETF 125
List-Id: JSON Meta Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/rn88O3vPtJyfVw81-x7IZ9aYrpo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:jmap-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:jmap-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jmap-leave@ietf.org>

Hi,

I wanted to give a quick update on three WG drafts I have been working on: JMAP Object Metadata, JMAP Enhanced Result References, and JMAP Mail Sharing.

The latest versions of these drafts include the suggestions and changes that Neil and Bron proposed. From my point of view the documents are now complete. However, if anyone has questions about the drafts or would like to propose any further changes, please send them to the list.

I would also like to know if people want to discuss any of these drafts during the JMAP session at IETF 125. If there is interest in discussion, I can ask Bron to allocate time on the agenda. Otherwise I do not have anything new to present about these drafts at the meeting.

For reference, here are the current versions:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-metadata/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-refplus/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-mail-sharing/


Thanks,
Mauro

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status