Re: [Jmap] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-sharing-07

Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com> Fri, 12 April 2024 02:33 UTC

Return-Path: <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2338CC14F694; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b="hY4QlxEd"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="WvGT7ZQE"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kNbJ1rpng3jN; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.155]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141C7C14F689; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F8511401EE; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:33:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:33:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1712889225; x=1712975625; bh=xV2X8fp+2pCKvU3iuXiFBAstewcv76kxiiFUkZ7GKek=; b= hY4QlxEdGfesLYDgcIhPJvedwnCvgFNOixerLUVfhl0fHBxOroar73LJAw7A+YWW xEyGun+FR/AYfdQpkSgIUjIC9h0mfcKMUm2U0tj9YkSplQBSmIhAgyuG7LgDCArW X5MfFlG5wW/ZuQ2V9pyFhbMcS/II6xUC/VxUfVxdBt1MQ3vtGQB7RoBryww6/Bkr MI2GTjFcadUWsmiz+r+ZYZopOpQiIEq/opSGhzAbNmVZ4vZAS8NDf47LXAIDE/af xlxICEMmSwQG1fkn05j+StJOiU+fO6vIxyd8jvS90a1fouueo5NyBihUECD7nnbp PoZ0V2AMxtME2YZETi3S2Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1712889225; x=1712975625; bh=xV2X8fp+2pCKvU3iuXiFBAstewcv 76kxiiFUkZ7GKek=; b=WvGT7ZQEpwS+ob/nnhMtCv45uKDdZenmhxKwVtsmD5PP d9pAWyDqeaYx7lS8NBnIgr8Sp1jPGBvHQYyBNQDWVmPS5ESEzIVvlNbH+nGYu+fL qMsiHSCMYvhGNjFPteYojDEh1sFqNxhXet0J2oPqYDIStPnQby2GR8cSNsDMf8Iu VMkEGOoqGXoU/J1aBnizEVJTa3yvsstAi+IBDAKGjNff8rpqDfA1BDfeIiBQ+lOm 4WclXDPWwvWtP1HGB60UAP3GuKEFICJKZHI++qLXzChfik1KnsD6jOqIfeqWH5v5 LsrlXm1tM9n1QXQJ6JYgT7jzl8pdcQPg03wmo3j+2Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:iJ0YZkJOIcUI6HWCPoEOjWXbOvoZMrPJRH4r5MYxQ17OFaYgNdgP9Q> <xme:iJ0YZkK6S4TxXtdyyRw6TPK7sEtReIBnvI1Km0bTs9uO05wcHXBpzT3nGnC8VpHSY vtotq4KUk2jPQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudeitddgvdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsegrtderreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfpfgv ihhlucflvghnkhhinhhsfdcuoehnvghilhhjsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkedvudethfehudelfeeitddvkeetledtjedugfffveej vdejgeethfetfefggeeunecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnvghilhhjsehfrghsthhm rghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:iJ0YZkvyzUVKpaCm6LnHYOjXwJqZrbCszbYZoyL5cxRhKBCzmGZCdQ> <xmx:iJ0YZhb4ZmzqU-9xr26wFNeByAGL3rJsNh8hGtCQ_jKOX_vTlB24Eg> <xmx:iJ0YZrYpR6_qJERtQT-Z9O24g4V5oxtcoS7PmDDUufujRRIXGZbd2Q> <xmx:iJ0YZtDidFkm7wN8ExYBzws5xHONcnvLUkivDaXHVmXte0IaDTPz7w> <xmx:iZ0YZqW_svH76vLmW7LOVk3V0txmCEKnD23A2hJ9Uzem2ktHUoUFvsAk>
Feedback-ID: ibc614277:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id C10CC2D4007D; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:33:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-379-gabd37849b7-fm-20240408.001-gabd37849
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-ThreadId: Tae8f3c8c03ed13f8
Message-Id: <8aed9135-5aeb-4fa5-b256-47c2ca719161@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <171276826915.3331.16058249245659792160@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <171276826915.3331.16058249245659792160@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:33:00 +1000
From: Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmailteam.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-jmap-sharing.all@ietf.org, IETF JMAP Mailing List <jmap@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="859ef615745b46ae895669e02df67cfe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/6aVw7e13gD0ec1J3AUsVbAGuG7o>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-sharing-07
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 02:33:54 -0000

Hi Linda,

> Major Issue: I think it is necessary to have a section on Error Handling to
> outline common error scenarios, categorization of error types, and recommended
> actions for error resolution.

I'm struggling a little to work out exactly what you're looking for here. This document describes a data model for sharing to be used within the JMAP (RFC8620 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8620>) protocol, which already defines fairly comprehensively how errors should be represented <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8620#section-3.6> at the request level <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8620#section-3.6.1>, method level <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8620#section-3.6.2>, and set (create/update/destroy) level <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8620#section-5.3>. Could you possibly be more specific about where this document introduces a new error handling requirement so I can address it?

Cheers,
Neil.