[jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single name
"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Fri, 17 August 2012 07:09 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDC421F858A for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.241, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YXhJXmV6WaHm for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.pacifier.net (smtp3.pacifier.net [64.255.237.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DE621F8589 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Tobias (122-49-181-93.ip.adam.com.au [122.49.181.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp3.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A506A38EFD for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: jose@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:37:31 +0930
Message-ID: <008001cd7c46$fb5837b0$f208a710$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac16RKHtofAZQFAhQTSskRTxljUg5w==
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single name
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:09:00 -0000
<CHAIR>
If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again. If you want to
provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS.
Should we change the current treatment of AES-CBC + HMAC to use a single
content encryption name.
Old: {"enc":"A128CBC", "int":HS256", "kdf":"CS256"}
New: {"enc":"AES128CBC+HS256+CS256"}
Exact name is still to be determined
Room vote: 12 yes, 2 no, 0 discuss
- [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single name Jim Schaad
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … Justin Richer
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … Dick Hardt
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … Manger, James H
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … Axel.Nennker
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … Ryo Ito
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … HAYASHI, Tatsuya
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … Edmund Jay
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … Edmund Jay
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … Breno de Medeiros
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … Chuck Mortimore
- Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single … nov matake