[jose] POLL: Add key wrap functionality for EC
"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Fri, 17 August 2012 07:09 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBC721F8596 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.427
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.427 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.172, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68oSFC77VMmO for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.pacifier.net (smtp3.pacifier.net [64.255.237.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94ADF21F8589 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Tobias (122-49-181-93.ip.adam.com.au [122.49.181.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp3.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 596D138F0B for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: jose@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:37:31 +0930
Message-ID: <008f01cd7c46$ff2210f0$fd6632d0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac16RYqUXu1nDxr2TtqRTWT/b00wkA==
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: [jose] POLL: Add key wrap functionality for EC
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 07:09:14 -0000
<CHAIR> If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again. If you want to provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS. Do we need to require the ability for doing a key agree followed by a key wrap to get the CMK? Current process uses the output of the key agree as the CMK, saying yes would allow for both methods to operate. Room vote: 12 yes, 1 no, 1 discuss