IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?

hideki nara <hdknr@ic-tact.co.jp> Mon, 15 April 2013 07:04 UTC

Return-Path: <hdknr@ic-tact.co.jp>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EF221F930C for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aVdDz91IrUpk for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8ADF21F9309 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id at1so5427037iec.27 for <jose@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=EVLGgl/zh9/fWqzPs/zpk0Brac22WpFrJIWmUD/arto=; b=na0O93IJmAWpoMNB0utfSTC72n54qAGGAcMGJCB6t+v2aTTtn4JqVOLQsvFuTxFPdM z/zonJ+hXwXG/SZ1/RrgRfzKs3nBO3wm59+HC5N1a9X5nqMTaJyuhEIoHT3GIU4DF1UK eC+ON0Ubo/bxT7j1QTO9JiZ+FxKtDrmrvedis0Yh1K92LKPskLBGiR2TtShL+iPWF9pl BsUGYpdjtQnP0HEZQVR9rDjGsZ5Vmagv5PxjpgBPrNx23CVnApR/Qc9MWuwEJPMGS6vq 15Kio3KY/1gEFI9vHdypBVfFWNTqkT4Az0aaiPyjcixLUFzHa9tmm6q7HENpAuLXS0Qd 43qQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.126.5 with SMTP id mu5mr4631084igb.50.1366009453370; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.103.194 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 00:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51674E3D.7030004@isoc.org>
References: <51674E3D.7030004@isoc.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:04:13 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAAkSUEE3+NYgmOxeQUh7jXkLqYe6Oi1J_cUayfwCQqx_8bsVA@mail.gmail.com>
From: hideki nara <hdknr@ic-tact.co.jp>
To: Karen ODonoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b1604313a860e04da60dcc3"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnltuhAIo9vPfalC4NRV4qFwjj8Q8Y2nVLeuKpONImUEgDhuSKknc3TABBINBZT2fkK9ydU
Cc: "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:04:14 -0000

1


2013/4/12 Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>

>  Issue #11 http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/11 proposes
> restructuring the JWE representation to remove the JWE Integrity Value
> field and instead use the RFC 5116 (AEAD) binary serialization to represent
> the Ciphertext, Initialization Vector, and Integrity Value values.  If this
> proposal is adopted, JWEs would then have three fields – the header, the
> encrypted key, and the RFC 5116 combination of the Ciphertext,
> Initialization Vector, and Integrity Value values.****** **
>
> This issue is also related to issue #3.  Note that the updated McGrew
> draft described there could be used whether or not we switched to using RFC
> 5116.******
>  **
>
> Which of these best describes your preferences on this issue?****
>
> 1.  Continue having separate Ciphertext, Initialization Vector, and
> Integrity Value values in the JWE representation.****
>
> 2.  Switch to using the RFC 5116 (AEAD) serialization to represent the
> combination of these three values.****
>
> 3.  Another resolution (please specify in detail).****
>
> 0.  I need more information to decide.****
>
> ** **
> Your reply is requested by Friday, April 19th or earlier.
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email