[jose] #65: Section 1. Introduction

"jose issue tracker" <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org> Sun, 18 August 2013 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0F111E8163 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rby5FYAZPsAx for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5ED11E8169 for <jose@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38768 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1VB8he-00047w-7C; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:31:54 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jose issue tracker <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org, ietf@augustcellars.com
X-Trac-Project: jose
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:31:54 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/jose/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/65
Message-ID: <061.cfbd5b043f72c716197808fd5b448366@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 65
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org, ietf@augustcellars.com, jose@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: mbj@microsoft.com
Resent-Message-Id: <20130818193156.EF5ED11E8169@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:31:56 -0700
Resent-From: trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: [jose] #65: Section 1. Introduction
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:23:05 -0000

#65: Section 1. Introduction

 A. The last sentence in paragraph one implies that this is the complete
 set.  This is not true.  This should reference back to the registry
 defined in JWA and not JWA as the authority for the set of algorithms in
 this document.

 B. Is this one of those situations where we care about the smallness of
 the member names.  If so then this should be stated and justified in this
 section.

 C. Is this one of those situations where we care about the smallness of
 the member values.  If so then this should be stated and justified in this
 section.

-- 
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:               |      Owner:  draft-ietf-jose-json-web-
  ietf@augustcellars.com |  key@tools.ietf.org
     Type:  defect       |     Status:  new
 Priority:  major        |  Milestone:
Component:  json-web-    |    Version:
  key                    |   Keywords:
 Severity:  -            |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/65>
jose <http://tools.ietf.org/jose/>