[jose] #64: Pointer to JWA in abstract needs evaluation
"jose issue tracker" <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org> Sun, 18 August 2013 19:30 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B36321F9F84 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WcQ84FzW9VwO for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052E221F9F74 for <jose@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38684 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1VB8fn-0003ek-7v; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:29:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: jose issue tracker <trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org, ietf@augustcellars.com
X-Trac-Project: jose
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:29:59 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/jose/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://grenache.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/64
Message-ID: <061.c1371f0fc5c57c246ec610e9e342482d@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 64
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key@tools.ietf.org, ietf@augustcellars.com, jose@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: mbj@microsoft.com
Resent-Message-Id: <20130818193003.052E221F9F74@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:30:02 -0700
Resent-From: trac+jose@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: [jose] #64: Pointer to JWA in abstract needs evaluation
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:23:04 -0000
#64: Pointer to JWA in abstract needs evaluation It is not clear to me that the pointer to the JWA document in the abstract is either necessary or correct. The sentence implies that all of the algorithms are in this document. This will not be a true statement over time. It is also not clear that this is information that is useful for the abstract to possess. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-jose-json-web- ietf@augustcellars.com | key@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Editorial | Milestone: Component: json-web- | Version: key | Keywords: Severity: - | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://grenache.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/64> jose <http://tools.ietf.org/jose/>
- [jose] #64: Pointer to JWA in abstract needs eval… jose issue tracker
- Re: [jose] #64: Pointer to JWA in abstract needs … jose issue tracker