[jose] Possible (minor) Errata for JWS / RFC7515

[Brian Campbell <[e-mail]>]

The recent discussion about whether or not to mandate using "crit" with the
"b64" header
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/current/msg05427.html> inspired
me to look at the support for "crit" in my own implementation (which was,
ahem, somewhat lacking). In doing so I went to add the "Negative Test Case
for "crit" Header Parameter" from Appendix E
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7515#appendix-E> and I noticed that the
header name used in the text and the unencoded header is different than
what's in the encoded JWS. It's "http://example.invalid/UNDEFINED" in the
former and "http://example.com/UNDEFINED" in the latter. The intent of the
test case is pretty clear but it's still inconsistent. Is this the kind of
thing that should be an errata?






<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7515#appendix-E>