Re: [jose] Preliminary Agenda for Interim Meeting

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Sat, 27 April 2013 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B06321F98A7 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.436
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.436 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.162, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6QZuc1Z-wXUX for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0244.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.244]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BFD21F98A3 for <jose@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BN1BFFO11FD014.protection.gbl (10.58.52.202) by BN1AFFO11HUB017.protection.gbl (10.58.52.127) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.675.0; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:05:16 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BN1BFFO11FD014.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.53.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.675.0 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:05:15 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.2.161]) by TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.180]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.003; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:05:13 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Thread-Topic: [jose] Preliminary Agenda for Interim Meeting
Thread-Index: Ac46QEZVOFHKxSmTSva1ifMOaDPoRwJNmkuAAAK9wQA=
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:05:12 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943676E8B1F@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <02e701ce3a40$485326d0$d8f97470$@augustcellars.com> <CAL02cgRygN=bdUrVLNbXAq8VvV12ERADSDwUqgU25fiKc_uJZw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgRygN=bdUrVLNbXAq8VvV12ERADSDwUqgU25fiKc_uJZw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.36]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943676E8B1FTK5EX14MBXC283r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(164054002)(189002)(69234004)(199002)(377454001)(24454001)(46102001)(4396001)(16297215002)(51856001)(50986001)(20776003)(74662001)(56816002)(16236675002)(66066001)(6806003)(79102001)(564824004)(55846006)(53806001)(56776001)(47736001)(512954001)(15202345002)(74366001)(65816001)(31966008)(49866001)(71186001)(47446002)(63696002)(54316002)(54356001)(80022001)(81542001)(47976001)(16406001)(74502001)(69226001)(77982001)(59766001)(561944001)(76482001)(81342001)(33656001)(15940465002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1AFFO11HUB017; H:TK5EX14MLTC102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-Forefront-PRVS: 08296C9B35
Cc: "jose@ietf.org" <jose@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [jose] Preliminary Agenda for Interim Meeting
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 20:05:19 -0000

Richard, it would be good if you could update your slides to reflect JWE-10, which should now be what's on your "State of the Art" and "Current -09" slides.  You should say that -10 it is compatible with all major AEAD algorithms and no longer say that the current format causes GCM nonce re-use.

FYI, -10 uses what you called the "Everyone Together" approach.

In your "Only what's needed" slide, you should point out that when applications are free to add header parameter values (which they now are), it's essentially impossible to know needs to be protected, in the general case.

                                                            Cheers,
                                                            -- Mike

From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Richard Barnes
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 11:40 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] Preliminary Agenda for Interim Meeting

Dear chairs,

As I suggested earlier, I think we should organize this meeting around the few big questions we need to get resolved, from which the answers to individual issues will follow.  So I would like to propose that we re-organize the agenda in the following way:

1. Mon. AM: Which fields are required / how to handle pre-negotiation?
2. Mon. PM: How should header parameter integrity protection be done?
3. Tue. AM: How should we do key wrapping, for JWE, JWS, and beyond?
4. Tue. PM: Review / close issues and wrap up

Also, Based on some side discussions, I've put together some slides that try to summarize the state of the art and proposals for (2).
<https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1HlBYEiwBFYUBA5751Q8U1GXD-W0cgdCZwpVMRdUkK2c/edit?usp=sharing>

Thanks,
--Richard


On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com<mailto:ietf@augustcellars.com>> wrote:
The chairs have posted their first cut at an agenda for the Interim meeting.

It can be found at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2013/04/29/jose/agenda/agenda-interim-2013-jose-1


Jim


_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
jose@ietf.org<mailto:jose@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose