IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] AD review of draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-04

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 21 April 2015 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583AE1A875D for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LcxSPN5qnLbO for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5B41A875C for <jose@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECED1BED6; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:16:30 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cYUfTEz3A-M8; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:16:30 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.73] (unknown [86.46.17.62]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4307BED0; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:16:29 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <5536B01D.6070909@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:16:29 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, 'Kathleen Moriarty' <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, 'Mike Jones' <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
References: <CAHbuEH4UfvUJtRE8Nj3vQv2B+yGKjPqi10+vSZoTvE4KYu79og@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH7ns7+bc-CZROtta5OHOLizg1+b7PBn=RmBsRx5WNnX3Q@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR03MB442D069E5BD81B2FF64467DF5EF0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAHbuEH4tEOgAprVokd4ki+RKP1gjGWq3ij25Qps4HR13Jb-rvA@mail.gmail.com> <00b101d07c59$bbd24e80$3376eb80$@augustcellars.com> <BY2PR03MB4423DD1A72C5FAA71BC6AF8F5EF0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAHbuEH6aB7+JGAFUepf4qN7a3P0G1+oGBfn5BH=k80bK-TEkUQ@mail.gmail.com> <00f701d07c6e$9d433aa0$d7c9afe0$@augustcellars.com>
In-Reply-To: <00f701d07c6e$9d433aa0$d7c9afe0$@augustcellars.com>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/uKRncUhuj6DAdJolZ4-hUtnADdc>
Cc: jose@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [jose] AD review of draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-04
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 20:16:33 -0000


On 21/04/15 21:06, Jim Schaad wrote:
> No it is really more like taking the hash of a SPKI.

Indeed;-) s/more like/just/ would produce a better outcome, but
I've said that before.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email