Re: [Json] Pete Resnick's Yes on charter-ietf-json-01-01: (with COMMENT)

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Wed, 02 April 2014 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12451A03D7 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04BxKDNUHf9m for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com (mail-vc0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E341A03D4 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id lf12so1083623vcb.25 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 13:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4uvB7ES8OLbY2JWYXstoOD+4X3wIX7xy/F9TX5sEfC0=; b=jE6VHLkUGh6WFgCvpmA7emL4o1Ew0jOomlW6aMJHANoEWVfcVI28ckiQVwIjtX1DG3 GcMKE+SMvzLv9++W1mYU4KG1RE5IXSng8JLaz1gRAbeynaPfdwDn/e/JuuwvtbUmyuTc TDYRYiU1DAbfHx7MagGMRDBTV+OyWwfH0kwEEdKO0oYooKZ5/njjMPSmRAV9ysJKwfjG zszbT9sZ/VKXybr6fSIY55fWWFkwxxTbHSfzDg9gFCeX7KLJD76nVPwdX9g2Po4xXNxn TsBpRvUGwpRzp6TzbH5ctfGd6tLY6evHbhRTLlfQeIQWqYgvsJqsDG0mifldXu1xro4R 6d9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmSdtuF4vZjFsD2Ijm4FNm0e6fY8Ddq9wfE2xG5/BjxAHGQ4CV+F18C+HHkDL93zHFdRDgo
X-Received: by 10.52.119.197 with SMTP id kw5mr2934477vdb.5.1396470585791; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 13:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.98.73 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [96.49.81.176]
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+hdci3cqOJ-EFXVoJAqk2Ygr+4ZLxT5nOWC=zwe6nURA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140402201319.14893.23931.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJ+hdci3cqOJ-EFXVoJAqk2Ygr+4ZLxT5nOWC=zwe6nURA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:29:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iveTahnHLLaNr5-nW4EpgVwKb5CEhqjPUMddiApqe+OcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/4IfoyeZeeccwWuK5Pn6paCaQe9Y
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Pete Resnick's Yes on charter-ietf-json-01-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:29:57 -0000

+1 on explicit invitation.  I wouldn’t be surprised if it didn’t get
much/any reaction, but there’s nothing to lose.

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>> I am ambivalent about external review. On the one hand, these activities
>> are really IETF internal. On the other, we've been trying to develop a
>> liaison relationship with Ecma. Input on this question welcome.
>
> Given what's happened with Ecma and what we're trying to make happen,
> I think it would be a mistake not to loop them in.  On the other hand:
> are they even on new-work?  External review won't be sufficient -- an
> explicit message to Ecma inviting their review would be needed.
>
> Barry
>
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json