IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] JSON & ECMA

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sat, 16 March 2013 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F8A21F85DF for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NllSDXdXteUe for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D683121F843E for <json@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-12.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2GNw00x005019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:58:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6isfWR=qP5aK0T=tH7ozFF+JjQh+rNB=m7F-5h=vK=MYPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:58:00 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AA21C328-8EFA-4D4A-B0E7-7478D92ADD6D@vpnc.org>
References: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E883516CD@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <6F8EC872-CF09-428A-A675-E96462DD5972@vpnc.org> <CAHBU6isfWR=qP5aK0T=tH7ozFF+JjQh+rNB=m7F-5h=vK=MYPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] JSON & ECMA
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:58:03 -0000

On Mar 16, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:

> Does the community get a chance to comment? I would argue strongly against any relationship with ECMA given an opportunity.

The community gets lots of opportunities to comment. We are now deciding what the WG charter should look like. Later, we will have opportunities to update the charter to add new work and other considerations.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email