Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguities (Re: serializing sequences of JSON values)
Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Fri, 14 March 2014 01:25 UTC
Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1611A07DA for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.1
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451,
FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334,
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wSFNpTfs0rQa for
<json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (unknown [69.163.253.144]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0913B1A07B8 for <json@ietf.org>;
Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A552005D10B for
<json@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=
mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from
:to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=FRClLRJI1ZpNfmH9OH/0 KF2eDW8=;
b=R/j3aouomqEwqw7YISgDy7r0CIpsU9L4W/JmIO4YBfGQ92c55gXf
5IOwFhoZ/Du6RQk7eOwVejpd1W6G4Zblc9eIAmSZaW0k25NVe1ayWDKSvZ/JW4l0
Vl1J2aLd6/x3ybB/CdiBYJrgJPRX/WsYZHmg+opd504mWP9VpZ6L7Ac=
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com
[209.85.212.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender:
nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with
ESMTPSA id 33DD12005D10A for <json@ietf.org>;
Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hm4so1952272wib.1 for
<json@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net;
s=20130820;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type; bh=rGdvnOcmUqr5tiIdOSuU43VudduV3rnhLcquPDt/5DU=;
b=PNoM6LsE3jtb8vfFEmjcs+qEhGLmkkevyHlZvKGxgLTt/MIgE18M5Q7+Y/667q+05z
ixM+H8EOJsSPk2DndvgUbDl1gFXPE6QPL1G5CPnwQWy4It/QekGfDq2+Vh5363ZzvQay
vPt7pFT86sSJlqpxxSTzkBxZPy0poRu3SPaa3lkmgiwbM6mwHBDucfDqeDa6R+MkcPcL
BVJ2hZL9pYoS5zoM2o7mfvIW9FuEQtQkIORGPa69oFda4Jz/xSzrdiBHtWYJ3zCLwOHu
bhuZMdUo3AooBkefm77r9D5mxxBwDIQMWNVWR7TwbhtPNLnETkoxpqXUuZVq9ZJMaJdY qT5A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.163.206 with SMTP id yk14mr3900125wib.5.1394760311133;
Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.199.6 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E115402F04C6@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
References: <CAK3OfOio58+1yuxQOcvWep1CADMfE1PVC48XDid0dWvd8=SVjA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOXDeqoYb=NXz4ikMxAg3EHFA+903bFgdpR_BL-K18U2oYriXQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAK3OfOiPDfWpOZgExTmwwq6WFcuVbyi_z3C0=M9RhQveBhV_+w@mail.gmail.com>
<3416a6327a8a4cd3b49bee3c2e548870@BL2PR02MB307.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
<CAK3OfOifggWiLMiTLt8_9rDVd0anrpp+1P2bwvUSJWbaUsVKNQ@mail.gmail.com>
<255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E115402F019B@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
<j7j4i9llmc2tfvjnrmllkpjso9hcp0li0i@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
<255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E115402F04C6@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 20:25:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOh0_cgArYrTNsWe1ZiXyaam34gtrgWcTs3LJWVvEf+4uw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: "Manger, James" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/GyYOgzvVzH4tkRvPEfI1x0-_hEE
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguities (Re: serializing
sequences of JSON values)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>,
<mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>,
<mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:25:20 -0000
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Manger, James <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> wrote: >> > application/jsons > >> Single character differences are not a very good pattern and this one >> may also have the wrong connotations (e.g., is 'jsons' to 'json' as >> 'https' is to 'http'). > > It has the perfect connotation: jsons looks like the plural of json, which is perfect for a format holding any number of JSON values. I'm sympathetic to a "single character differences" lead to typos/errors argument. I'm also sympathetic to an argument about wasting bandwidth. I happen to like application/jsons, but would settle for application/json-sequence. Nico --
- [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguities (… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Tatu Saloranta
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Matthew Morley
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Matthew Morley
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Manger, James
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Manger, James
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Json] Regarding JSON text sequence ambiguiti… Nico Williams