IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02.txt

"Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com> Thu, 16 June 2016 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2EE12DCCA for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ge_c8fLYVdLb for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900C412DCC6 for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1573; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1466114453; x=1467324053; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=GQ7fL4DRIkvSEsTQSBzgRVwnF2k5UHq5j0Vckuo0zf4=; b=XNrrV5+RLVO1ZpPTAojm3MRkkbrBLbwo3BX42kr0OWATmf7903alWQ9d IfgP1hjIwrf9aS8gxefRHiTG18TgY7Kllv+zNnRCaiAvMM/v7L8ql+KM8 hszr2Bujwnxu2FlpyfPzjufAbMZ+1hryxqpg1rHx9g75+HZReB9etUUX3 w=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 496
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AaAgA0IWNX/4sNJK1egz6BUwa6VoF6hhcCgSw4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RLAQEBAwEjVgULAgEIGCoCAjIlAgQBDQUOiBoIsCKQUQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQ4OiB6CVodBK4IvAQSYbwIBgy2BaYkSgVONT490AR42gggcgUxuiHx/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,481,1459814400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="286670666"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 16 Jun 2016 22:00:52 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5GM0q34009096 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:00:52 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:00:52 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:00:52 -0500
From: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Thread-Topic: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRx4EwF4LbEztrsESZSZB6P9hXPJ/ryCGAgAAALYCAARcYAIAAGoCA
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:00:52 +0000
Message-ID: <F5652454-FB70-499A-A93F-4D7E243C88E7@cisco.com>
References: <20160616034238.26185.479.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHBU6itvDjZon-=xtgu=MCMsjU1UtL=pXFP6-kuf1AF_w9rn3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6ise43q3d0bVyivMtPn2LYgB2Bu_1--UFzi4SGkewKV8_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAVtDj7npNkWt_F+iQcdp=0StYAtQ=eo7awEzV6uzvikQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVAVtDj7npNkWt_F+iQcdp=0StYAtQ=eo7awEzV6uzvikQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-pgp-agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.129.24.65]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_22460943-3439-4F3B-A31C-A501161F3485"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/UEHnPTSLlQ87VfVrhwdNeUObQAY>
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:00:56 -0000

> On Jun 16, 2016, at 14:26, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
>> One question for the chairs:
>> 
>> What’s the quid pro quo?  What change will ECMA be making as part of this
>> process?
> 
> As the former AD who was part of sorting this out with ECMA:
> They are supposed to do the same, putting something in their docs that
> points to ours and says something similar about having the two specs
> remain converged.
> 

Thanks Barry.  Yes, this is what has been agreed to by Ecma TC39.


--
- m&m

Matt Miller
Cisco Systems, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email