Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-i-json-02

John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> Sat, 12 July 2014 02:40 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6471B1A0108 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 19:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K50VKLWKrEhz for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 19:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 154811A00F8 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 19:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1X5mu4-0001py-V2; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 22:19:09 -0400
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 22:19:08 -0400
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Message-ID: <20140712021908.GK14123@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <53B21F69.7010101@cisco.com> <53C066AE.9050104@cisco.com> <c8391b02d1f045ce85747420d7f9e756@BL2PR02MB307.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <c8391b02d1f045ce85747420d7f9e756@BL2PR02MB307.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/czv_yzRjWpbsCXoPWWvoHS5txC8
Cc: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>, Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Json] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-i-json-02
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 02:40:53 -0000

Larry Masinter scripsit:

> I think I originally supported the development of I-JSON as
> useful named profile of JSON. However, based on recent discussions
> and further examination, my opinion now is that the particular
> collection of constraints isn't special, and the document should
> instead be recast as a "Best Practices for Internet Use of JSON".

-1

> To facilitate using the document as a normative reference, each
> constraint/best practice could be named "no-dup-names",
> "ieee-numbers", "utf8". 

This, however, would be a Good Thing.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less
than half of you half as well as you deserve.  --Bilbo