IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Last Call: <draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-07.txt> (The JSON Data Interchange Format) to Proposed Standard

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 11 November 2013 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D1C21E81DD for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:18:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DXjK0C6lDcUS for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:18:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9717F11E81B5 for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LnPnu-1VF6lW0W4c-00hakE for <json@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:18:36 +0100
Message-ID: <5281116A.6020107@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:18:34 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <20131111143420.20298.75880.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5280EF6F.6030102@gmx.de> <20131111164138.GC13063@mercury.ccil.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131111164138.GC13063@mercury.ccil.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:k/vkaMeTNy31IEnA+cy2NzRfOzGUjMjg5jlHJCq79xGmOp2lUsp Ktha+/d6T7XjeCRGXnzvmVMZmhYTZlu3pd66kNS2XRaUT84NaGjJTwp8uvBsYXMXul6eOev pRxwo7CWoOhmR/QU9Foarn61lSgvGBV7iqee5iddJqexoBtlC5KMwgMsnKPm80bGTeNPCya dBRBOJE+g/9KV//7XF9Cg==
Cc: json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] Last Call: <draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-07.txt> (The JSON Data Interchange Format) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:18:56 -0000

On 2013-11-11 17:41, John Cowan wrote:
> Julian Reschke scripsit:
>
>> Why only "proposed"?
>
> All IETF Internet Standards start out life as Proposed Standards, and the
> vast bulk of them remain so.  Of the 2378 non-obsolete standards-track
> RFCs that exist today, only 90 of them have undergone the more rigorous
> process to become Internet Standards.

I'm aware of that :-)

What I forgot (and just remembered) is that RFC 4627 (which is being 
revised here) wasn't on the standards track.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email