Re: [Json] String comparisons -- LAST CHANCE ON PROPOSALS

"Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> Tue, 11 June 2013 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB71821F96E9 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QFNCL6olNs2c for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CB121F9638 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.1]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lrp0S-1UMeJ60R6E-013gtp for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:21:50 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2013 18:21:49 -0000
Received: from 84-115-182-43.dynamic.surfer.at (EHLO Vostro3500) [84.115.182.43] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 11 Jun 2013 20:21:49 +0200
X-Authenticated: #419883
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ems8MgGtevjW2HTNCU9Rc+vGRxu+xKP6x0gHFUw 6GY+8T0rDEl81F
From: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
To: <json@ietf.org>
References: <0FBD58CE-748D-419A-8578-CCBF3FDF97CE@vpnc.org> <51B76812.6050307@drees.name>
In-Reply-To: <51B76812.6050307@drees.name>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:21:47 +0200
Message-ID: <009a01ce66d0$892afe50$9b80faf0$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac5mzvr1VlQShFFKQJifLLB7Dnq0nwAAQieA
Content-Language: de
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: Re: [Json] String comparisons -- LAST CHANCE ON PROPOSALS
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:22:07 -0000

On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 8:10 PM, Stefan Drees wrote:
> I do not know what the most convenient form of the proposal I want to
> make in this case is:
> In both proposals above (1 and 2) the terms "key" and "keys" are used,
> where I propose to use "name" and "names" respectively instead.

+1, was just about to say the same.: So both proposals should be changed to

For the purpose of establishing equality of names within an object... to the
characters in names...


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler