IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7159 (4264)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 06 February 2015 08:10 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BC11A1A2F for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 00:10:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yikc18xOPok4 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 00:10:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71FE81A1A4D for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 00:10:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.175] ([93.217.112.94]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LkgAG-1XjTl918IG-00aSXF; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 09:10:16 +0100
Message-ID: <54D476D1.6080501@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 09:09:53 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, tbray@textuality.com, barryleiba@computer.org, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, mamille2@cisco.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org
References: <20150206074639.C681B18380A@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150206074639.C681B18380A@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+WgaMXfkAqq0a9FLa1MhgdZ6iUZflAT36d/QDsI4BQ/ELGqQB+y sLqcrZc+vIWEWOmM+nvf9Xg+k65kD++PhXoTmQKzjGgR/68J733vt93qtdptYfp0ym6gUzA i8mB7YhU4riLNY1NlGLo6djzSoeToWBSaF/N+/TGfcHcHZkTsnun4+OEtWVYfTF9FzCKOMm xngtxVgiquXFxWOtTl/rw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/n1qNJxLPmq-EHmLIvRkTebOnIfw>
Cc: federico_dopino@fibertel.com.ar, json@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Json] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7159 (4264)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:10:40 -0000

On 2015-02-06 08:46, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7159,
> "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7159&eid=4264
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Federico do Pino <federico_dopino@fibertel.com.ar>
>
> Section: 15.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>     [Err3607]  RFC Errata, Errata ID 3607, RFC 3607,
>                <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>
>     [Err607]   RFC Errata, Errata ID 607, RFC 607,
>                <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>     [Err3607]  RFC Errata, Errata ID 3607, for RFC 4627,
>                <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>
>     [Err607]   RFC Errata, Errata ID 607, for RFC 4627,
>                <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>
> Notes
> -----
> The references point to RFCs by the same numbers as the errata IDs, while the intention was to refer to errata (by the same IDs) reported for the previous JSON RFC, namely RFC 4627. (RFCs 607 and 3607 are completely unrelated.)

Right. This was reported before, but I guess everybody forgot to report 
an erratum.

> The links may also be replaced with direct links to the errata pages, for instance http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=607 and http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=3607

Indeed. Unfortunately, the RFC Editor doesn't want to include the full 
URIs because they might not be stable. Sigh.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email