IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7159 (4264)

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Fri, 06 February 2015 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F331A017C for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 00:02:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id la30xUo6d-x0 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 00:02:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562EE1A1A2F for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 00:02:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netb ([89.204.135.27]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lkzph-1XjkkC2KHd-00ajQR; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 09:01:58 +0100
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 09:01:56 +0100
Message-ID: <65t8dah7bgvchu8nscarq5aal8i3p7k34q@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <20150206074639.C681B18380A@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150206074639.C681B18380A@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pKV3UwJUtjBtnfjCmAbMIOZFTSVj94dfXQyc559Nu0n28rKzKrL gIwu/zBsnxv5MqhQdfJxExx4Hs+9q0wi/c77mYcLhWvYU0fgYPihVKCygPIV2Ukb+gu1eSw NOZawZH5gL4NgJNlmoSlEBPGIo5WUOspdgwAT4Kb4qjrE3tkYeexSvY3PcAFLnWdWAcDasu 2vtIQn4Y6NnVXsb+YFpTA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/p_tYxBHtXhRwE38EH8sRhAVmKfU>
Cc: federico_dopino@fibertel.com.ar, presnick@qti.qualcomm.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, json@ietf.org, tbray@textuality.com, mamille2@cisco.com, barryleiba@computer.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [Json] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7159 (4264)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:02:20 -0000

* RFC Errata System wrote:
>Notes
>-----
>The references point to RFCs by the same numbers as the errata IDs, 
>while the intention was to refer to errata (by the same IDs) reported 
>for the previous JSON RFC, namely RFC 4627. (RFCs 607 and 3607 are 
>completely unrelated.)
>
>The links may also be replaced with direct links to the errata pages, 
>for instance http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=607 and 
>http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=3607

Agreed. I have checked the errata IDs and at least they do check out.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
 Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015)  · http://www.websitedev.de/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email