[Json] JSON Schema Language
Ulysse Carion <ulysse@segment.com> Fri, 03 May 2019 23:59 UTC
Return-Path: <ulysse@segment.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6077C120133 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=segment.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NHrR1J2u00kO for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52CF112010F for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 May 2019 16:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id m7so4340881ioa.6 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 May 2019 16:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=segment.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hpBANsPuGbU/MeGL14+mdh4ay7VoUFgea352tb/67MM=; b=BOumt5wFrnCbjWCw+crrtqU73OfYkdDdo3MutUGU0odr9/Agw/DYEZpLwGDikVmBYE /FCSlll+r2aGGFKPZTnVfix90tW/2WCxRcdi6LdPz6vHF16ONoeE9Uf2Ge1pBhEnXf8K 6NLkKINfAXyxS8k8NnoDvyBucDKTvXQaMgpkI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hpBANsPuGbU/MeGL14+mdh4ay7VoUFgea352tb/67MM=; b=spdRKqqvL5+YHhJYKPQle5WwQZaL0vlMr61KElDt2FHFnrj45QOXVr1oBAXPuimvuQ IkzbHYPslA/rtf54vqHkSbkOaf2ZpfO4nH3vIa4kWrk6DZGztGMvb3ht3Ya2mOZNRpXd 89iwKVII0O3BTltuF7V0InzWhv7p4PnCHGH/VJ/cDTyeHLQ7amImMl2rmnAVNWy71bwB CUSwjlY/BenKUwiPvcvphIQy303ci7JMp8fA4dJhqS+FTRc04FNvm1F8EdVit75/+Zoz G3QqA/JICDkz+CrCTbksCoJLw98djuXFqQtKqNLLJf3dGSTtHMVEciE4Eutv1zF/GdUI TfPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX8Y9csD98akSnBOl65W3OsN1WHng4Iis+J0+WY6gabQXsy2YJO DiwYF9Ry15PggkNZbNmRHf/PgNtTDy6x+Cu5QITxwU1HhrE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxVFsqi03OP4r4I2mzBFc5BoUSSEZ6zdsfI5eiM9DFe9dAr3GrN8Cr60q3xXfYe/z4G/aFxS3q0y7/T+6P5qDo=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9b90:: with SMTP id r16mr8942895iom.217.1556927963178; Fri, 03 May 2019 16:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ulysse Carion <ulysse@segment.com>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 16:59:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJK=1RjV1uv0eOdtFZ8cKn-FfCwCiGP5r2hOz1UamiM6YV4H1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: json@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/pkI8w-djHBKsfPFv43g_2G3A3Mg>
Subject: [Json] JSON Schema Language
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 23:59:26 -0000
Hello all, I have recently published an I-D for what I'm calling JSON Schema Language, a way to validate JSON data's shape, and generate code (i.e., types, classes, docs, etc.) from that shape: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-json-schema-language-00 In previous correspondence with this list, Carsten Bormann has noted that this WG has hesitated to prematurely adopt any given proposal, preferring to let them develop until their distinct applications become clear. It is my belief that JSON Schema Language does have a clear use-case, one which Tim Bray has articulated clearly here: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2018/09/22/JSON-scheming I believe JSON Schema Language solves precisely what Tim describes, while eschewing his concerns with the json-schema.org project. For those inclined toward the concrete, the bottom of this page contains a live demo of JSON Schema Language using the TypeScript implementation: https://json-schema-language.github.io/ The project's GitHub organization also contains the source for a Rust and TypeScript implementation, as well as a full test suite: https://github.com/json-schema-language With Carsten's note in mind, does there nevertheless exist a path for JSON Schema Language, or something like it, to become an RFC? I appreciate the desire to avoid premature adoption by this WG. I assume this partially stems from caution around throwing the weight of json@ietf.org behind any given specification. Perhaps some other path to specification exists? With kind regards, Ulysse Carion
- [Json] JSON Schema Language Ulysse Carion
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language John Cowan
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Peter Patel-Schneider
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Erik Wilde
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Erik Wilde
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Ulysse Carion
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language John Cowan
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Erik Wilde
- [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Schema L… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Daniel P
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Ulysse Carion
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… Austin Wright
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Rob Sayre
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… Manger, James
- Re: [Json] Adding integers to JSON (Re: JSON Sche… Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language John Cowan
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Rob Sayre
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Rob Sayre
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Rob Sayre
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Nico Williams
- [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON validatio… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] JSON Schema Language Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… Ulysse Carion
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… Pete Cordell
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] A minimal examplotron-style JSON valid… Nico Williams