Re: [Json] more errata (references)

15.2 Informative References

On 4 Mar 2014, at 5:37 pm, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:

> On 3/4/14 5:31 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> * Pete Resnick wrote:
>>   
>>> On 3/4/14 5:11 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Hm.
>>>> 
>>>>    [Err3607]  RFC Errata, Errata ID 3607, RFC 3607,
>>>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>>>> 
>>>>    [Err607]   RFC Errata, Errata ID 607, RFC 607,
>>>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>>>> 
>>>> Really??
>>>>       
>>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=3607>
>>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=607>
>>> 
>>> These two errata are on RFC 4627. Erratum 3607 is marked as "Held For
>>> Document Update" and 607 is marked as "Verified".
>>> 
>>> What's the question?
>>>     
>> Read the reference text more carefully. RFC 3607 is "Chinese Lottery
>> Cryptanalysis Revisited: The Internet as a Codebreaking Tool" and RFC
>> 607 is "Comments on the File Transfer Protocol".
>>   
> 
> Where did Julian's text above come from? The RFC Editor web site? This sounds like a report of a bug on the RFC Editor web site, displaying the wrong RFC number, not an issue for this WG.
> 
> pr
> 
> -- 
> Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
> 
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/