Re: [Json] more errata (references)

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 04 March 2014 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B091A027F for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:39:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UC_8d4qEC6BD for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:39:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43431A027D for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:39:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-b2d4.meeting.ietf.org (unknown [31.133.178.212]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D647950A89; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:39:42 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <53160F3E.1000408@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 17:39:42 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F42BA498-0ABB-428E-8BE6-55DB150FDBEC@mnot.net>
References: <5316095B.5050201@gmx.de> <53160CEE.6010405@qti.qualcomm.com> <s83ch918lcb49vse9afpjmb2arhki2kh8m@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <53160F3E.1000408@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/vgp55Lx7E4U_7NvWBzWo6vYXZtE
Cc: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] more errata (references)
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:39:52 -0000

15.2 Informative References


On 4 Mar 2014, at 5:37 pm, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:

> On 3/4/14 5:31 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> * Pete Resnick wrote:
>>   
>>> On 3/4/14 5:11 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Hm.
>>>> 
>>>>    [Err3607]  RFC Errata, Errata ID 3607, RFC 3607,
>>>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>>>> 
>>>>    [Err607]   RFC Errata, Errata ID 607, RFC 607,
>>>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org>.
>>>> 
>>>> Really??
>>>>       
>>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=3607>
>>> <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=607>
>>> 
>>> These two errata are on RFC 4627. Erratum 3607 is marked as "Held For
>>> Document Update" and 607 is marked as "Verified".
>>> 
>>> What's the question?
>>>     
>> Read the reference text more carefully. RFC 3607 is "Chinese Lottery
>> Cryptanalysis Revisited: The Internet as a Codebreaking Tool" and RFC
>> 607 is "Comments on the File Transfer Protocol".
>>   
> 
> Where did Julian's text above come from? The RFC Editor web site? This sounds like a report of a bug on the RFC Editor web site, displaying the wrong RFC number, not an issue for this WG.
> 
> pr
> 
> -- 
> Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
> 
> _______________________________________________
> json mailing list
> json@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/