Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-16
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Thu, 03 August 2023 21:47 UTC
Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABC3C1516E3 for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 14:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=textuality.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4tn_NFPgnLMx for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 14:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2356C15152E for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 14:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5223fbd54c6so1838413a12.3 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 14:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality.com; s=google; t=1691099234; x=1691704034; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xW1RSGDHc/8mUwkrGEWTPukLGNd+AFpqcwTNvo60GyM=; b=fOOu5cLMxxzjAXcbKrKJWf5ihk6SDs7svKAiX5Ov/7mqgZom2u0kHWSGJ8JmWH3qfn /bLSA8t3cbDIhNOD+5s3oglM5PtUKzwmg6troeCA4W2vZJeBsb0013iVowAoB2W2M672 IQO6+nMBzuJ5ZdvCnNOa785zIgxw/3DlFxGjc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691099234; x=1691704034; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=xW1RSGDHc/8mUwkrGEWTPukLGNd+AFpqcwTNvo60GyM=; b=e+PsfbrTLx4DesTHMrslR8GVAtPadCTg8joiikkLqeokMOVqFbUtODNTOhRc64PbYs 6yKeHgr7D5bqhpLMNUe5wTxDxr3M13L1yKbCheZwkvliOyFLk4HQKWViz16Bb18CF3ua EeNNkkA3uZEuD/KSDN6IN6ibT+CPdY9fpookD1Zvqu5U5leujSfCY/SAcGyLQ4zN7hG2 qYL70cjkkUDCKdC7efwYJ856EGWV7hSZ/CaiGl3OF3O1hkCKdBzLqW4y5PwB94gSPdl2 On42xzbMYAC9btKudOmiJ7+PsahWTUHP367ICXFqcOjNAQOn+zU81EQdHHAhZPdxuCqd 43NQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxd41tYg/1ESq768yvQ3UJL/RzzSRmiHK3WmBMQC9zBtBQmPjSF ZvwcmCVNGvhUgIH47kMK+BdA408npW2u4wePRwt7Mw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHcNQN/Z/iYkrU+tYSwU9W94NMcMg44aRHg+O047RLjnJlzSPM/pzHaGcYPiEQn3bKlFhM5wC0fQDzH2rROv+g=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:de14:0:b0:51d:e3d2:f5eb with SMTP id h20-20020aa7de14000000b0051de3d2f5ebmr50864edv.5.1691099234178; Thu, 03 Aug 2023 14:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 16:47:13 -0500
Received: from 1064022179695 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 3 Aug 2023 16:47:10 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mimestream 1.0.5)
References: <169099560074.55569.16694235228971863023@ietfa.amsl.com> <CANH0Gb+ZGHQe71jshjrJpD-HfhuAgWFnb85QKvyzfk699SstTg@mail.gmail.com> <BN9PR11MB53716DDF7BD3A8C194EAF7B5B808A@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CANH0GbJSY=8cgi5=48bmHEij_DYOLtEcMmhvjhcVjVEsLMt5PA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iv-FiBNzX4g0+CH+FWZ4cBiibcSLQGdgmRT8sU01DUKDg@mail.gmail.com> <F84FD272-3AE5-4BD3-AF76-799BC5661D57@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <F84FD272-3AE5-4BD3-AF76-799BC5661D57@tzi.org>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 16:47:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iun8r6sg2Mam4D4A1nfd4C68=_JOrkWaazVv8rL_du+Dw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Glyn Normington <glyn.normington.work@gmail.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-jsonpath-base.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-jsonpath-base.all@ietf.org>, "jsonpath@ietf.org" <jsonpath@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000222d3906020bb9f2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/KBOmbB3PclNDgGyDfK0CqXdgyrA>
Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-jsonpath-base-16
X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page <jsonpath.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath/>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 21:47:20 -0000
On Aug 3, 2023 at 2:43:55 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > > I can think of two reasons why you would put them: > > (1) If you want to write a query that works with JSONPath-base as well as > an existing implementation that does require the parentheses. > > (2) If you believe the parentheses increase readability (in general for a > specific query, or possibly just to people that are used to the > parentheses). > … But I wouldn’t try to give guidance here for the same reasons I wouldn’t > try to give guidance for return in C. > Um, I think you just did? I really do think that in RFCs, when there’s something that’s optional, it’s really better to say why it’s optional and what might motivate choosing one option or another. > Grüße, Carsten > >
- [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Joe Clarke via Datatracker
- Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-i… Glyn Normington
- Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-i… Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-i… Glyn Normington
- Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-i… Tim Bray
- Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-i… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-i… Tim Bray
- Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-i… Greg Dennis
- Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-i… Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: [Jsonpath] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review … Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-i… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Jsonpath] Opsdir last call review of draft-i… Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: [Jsonpath] [Last-Call] Opsdir last call revie… Rob Sayre
- Re: [Jsonpath] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review … Greg Dennis
- Re: [Jsonpath] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review … Glyn Normington
- Re: [Jsonpath] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review … Joe Clarke (jclarke)