Re: [Jsonpath] June interim meeting

> I would prefer if we could merge the ready-to-merge PRs (#94, #101) and get the other ones rebased on those.
> With enough time before tomorrow’s meeting that we can still prepare slides.

I have merged PRs 94 & 101 and asked the raisers of the two other
non-draft PRs to rebase.

On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 06:32, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>
> On 14. Jun 2021, at 06:07, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:
>
>
> I don't know who's coming but I just spent a certain amount of time looking at our PR list and, while I have opinions about the details, I think it's difficult to follow the rapid evolution of these discussions over the last week or so.
>
>
> I would prefer if we could merge the ready-to-merge PRs (#94, #101) and get the other ones rebased on those.
> With enough time before tomorrow’s meeting that we can still prepare slides.
>
> Can the document authors please get the merging done quickly, so the submitters can rebase their PRs?
> This is not the time to be shy — I know there are authors on the document that are invisible, but this will have to be done by the ones who have been doing the work.
>
> (I apologise for forking #99 off #98; I hope I have explained why the tooling made this necessary.
> I don’t know how “alive” #75 is; the actual PR would need rebasing after the selector work has progressed.)
>
> So there really only is
>
> — #97, which after rebasing is a single remaining change.  That needs discussion, because it is indicative of a fundamental problem we haven’t addressed yet.
> — #99 (with most of the discussion in the thread on #98), which desperately needs to be split up into smaller PRs building on top of each other.
>
> This is to ask Greg/Glyn/Carsten/Stefan for their help in walking us through which of these selector--definition and terminology issues are considered "open" and worthy of WG time at the meeting.
>
>
> I can certainly make a slide or two on the remaining significant terminology issue.
> (That doesn’t mean terminology is otherwise done, it’s just good enough that work can continue on technical content.)
>
> Should someone want to post a summary/overview note before the meeting that would also be useful.
>
>
> Given the short time remaining, I’d prefer to do that in the form of slideware.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> --
> Jsonpath mailing list
> Jsonpath@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath