Re: [karp] WGLC of draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis-03

[Sean Turner <[e-mail]>]

Sam,

That's okay by me.

spt

On 6/6/12 2:37 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Hi.
> Looking at the draft I'd prefer to address your two comments by updating
> the solutions work section to add a paragraph  describing what has been
> accomplished.
> I think that works better than  working the solution work back in
> throughout the rest of the draft.
> The intent of this analysis was to capture the work that lead to
> deciding we need the solutions.
>>>>>> "Sean" == Sean Turner<[e-mail]>  writes:
>      Sean>  Also should this sentence be changed:
>
>      Sean>  OLD:
>
>      Sean>  A security solution will be developed for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 based on
>      Sean>  the OSPFv2 cryptographic authentication option.
>
>      Sean>  NEW:
>
>      Sean>  A security solution will be developed for OSPFv3 based on the OSPFv2
>      Sean>  cryptographic authentication option.
>
>
> No, it's correct as written.  we're updating both ospfv2 and v3.  For
> both we're using the existing v2 as a basis.  For v3 it's an entirely
> new option.  For v2 it's a new option that handles source address,
> requires enough constraints that we get inter-connection replay, etc.
>