IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [karp] WGLC of draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis-03

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 06 June 2012 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC5511E80B2 for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.242, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tNq2yyQXaNkD for <karp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from permutation-city.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5298211E80C7 for <karp@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EF012043E; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 14:37:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 19FAC4151; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 14:37:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
References: <02717414-847B-4E3C-9F47-7AE30947F052@cisco.com> <4FB7FAC3.70701@ieca.com> <tsld35oeed0.fsf@mit.edu> <4FC3BE9D.7080506@ieca.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:37:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4FC3BE9D.7080506@ieca.com> (Sean Turner's message of "Mon, 28 May 2012 14:06:21 -0400")
Message-ID: <tslk3zk5lsh.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, karp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [karp] WGLC of draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis-03
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:37:46 -0000

Hi.
Looking at the draft I'd prefer to address your two comments by updating
the solutions work section to add a paragraph  describing what has been
accomplished.
I think that works better than  working the solution work back in
throughout the rest of the draft.
The intent of this analysis was to capture the work that lead to
deciding we need the solutions.
>>>>> "Sean" == Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> writes:
    Sean> Also should this sentence be changed:

    Sean> OLD:

    Sean> A security solution will be developed for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 based on
    Sean> the OSPFv2 cryptographic authentication option.

    Sean> NEW:

    Sean> A security solution will be developed for OSPFv3 based on the OSPFv2
    Sean> cryptographic authentication option.


No, it's correct as written.  we're updating both ospfv2 and v3.  For
both we're using the existing v2 as a basis.  For v3 it's an entirely
new option.  For v2 it's a new option that handles source address,
requires enough constraints that we get inter-connection replay, etc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email