Re: [karp] KARP Agenda at IETF 76
"Gregory M. Lebovitz" <gregory.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 28 October 2009 00:57 UTC
Return-Path: <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: karp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: karp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8583A6861 for <karp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2bnrzkQsneTi for <karp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pw0-f50.google.com (mail-pw0-f50.google.com [209.85.160.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320743A6359 for <karp@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so523120pwi.29 for <karp@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:x-mailer:date:to :from:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; bh=WCvY/VuVa7d8SglcY2E3Rl4LNbbKU7eUjCpwPzfrJnQ=; b=SEb8oaBhcLcwsZ40zM6eAdc7yXWoRRXU6TZ+VYjWtn2kkEsSGvDoSCssMK7j8aa0c9 CwRSZIP9vF9qjUmV+bTzxAWEYPMty2lk+SrvWpPl5w1P/FZmdBONYKYw+ANYCtP6ooeu 8UkrAp/0O7oOmN+bOXYksWG9EMSlyjoi1Lris=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:x-mailer:date:to:from:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; b=hFxzMYtZattU2srJk2r++CRZK9qlNlva6aSLJzELNUK5DuctrlIcIxSvTR9JzPOYZy SRt7X+o5FFO9iq3+F0sNFWNzl6M162LOG47GFerguZvPVGbVfLPVw4xZGscuKrLBdOiA 85ReM6wzlnrYEALyoZGe3LGTuzFzhJIpKFGoI=
Received: by 10.114.187.7 with SMTP id k7mr1829941waf.106.1256691475765; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Gregory-T60.gmail.com (nat-service4.juniper.net [66.129.225.151]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm251636pzk.2.2009.10.27.17.57.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4ae79712.9613f30a.5387.159a@mx.google.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:57:50 -0700
To: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>, karp@ietf.org
From: "Gregory M. Lebovitz" <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <02562157-F43A-4151-9D11-7D0EB3151B16@cisco.com>
References: <02562157-F43A-4151-9D11-7D0EB3151B16@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [karp] KARP Agenda at IETF 76
X-BeenThere: karp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for key management for routing and transport protocols <karp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/karp>
List-Post: <mailto:karp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp>, <mailto:karp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:57:48 -0000
At 08:12 PM 10/26/2009, Brian Weis wrote:
>Folks,
>
>The draft agenda for the BoF has been posted:
><http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09nov/agenda/karp.html >.
Thanks a ton, Joel and Brian, for getting this out. Looks great. A
few comments:
The current versions will be:
draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-08
draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-01
They should publish today or tomorrow.
I'd like to see the roadmap discussion (my part) broken down into
it's more explanative piece parts, as these are the parts that a BoF
really needs to discuss separately, and don't rightfully belong in
one huge document as I have them today. Rather, they belong in 3
different documents, I would think.
- Goals / Overview - 5 min
- Threat Model - 7 min
- Requirements - 8 min
- Framework - 10 min
Could we add this to the charter:
- Definition of the process of what work will be done in KARP vs in
routing WG's and how the overlaps will be handled. - 10 min
To get more time for this process discussion, I'd suggest the example
preso of TCP-AO be shortened to 10 min. Justification: we don't need
to teach on -AO, just quickly show how we got from MD5 to -AO as an
example. Then we can take 5 min from the discussion at the end, to
create a total of 10 min for the definition of process part.
Last, I'd like to see some of brief examples of work in progress on
KARP-like topics from the community. Several of you have sent me
things like these, from Vishwas:
1.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto-issues-00.txt
is the draft I was talking about.
2. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5310 is the IS-IS RFC.
3. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-03 is the
equivalent OSPF draft
4. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bhatia-manral-igp-crypto-requirements-03
is the draft for Crypto requirements.
Would anyone like to give a 5 min preso on any of these things? Or
any other related work?
Gregory.
>Thanks,
>Joel & Brian
>_______________________________________________
>karp mailing list
>karp@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/karp
- [karp] KARP Agenda at IETF 76 Brian Weis
- Re: [karp] KARP Agenda at IETF 76 Gregory M. Lebovitz
- Re: [karp] KARP Agenda at IETF 76 Brian Weis
- Re: [karp] KARP Agenda at IETF 76 Gregory M. Lebovitz
- Re: [karp] KARP Agenda at IETF 76 Manav Bhatia