Re: [kitten] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-kitten-krb-spake-preauth-11: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 19 January 2024 04:18 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA49C14CEE4; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 20:18:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hIE3xZfjMXpD; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 20:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42FD3C14F749; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 20:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-554d515c5a0so82949a12.1; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 20:18:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705637884; x=1706242684; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=n9S6FGbSuezoG5x0B7lMC46YZ1wGfl4XA9Rhx3SZWY0=; b=hLtIcrOzOcuTgGrBgVtslAJsOZiJ09JwZ2tR4ihrGQmVc92GTYx3V9NYGS0eg3CjQ0 5E2KnLpZJMm3KAZfeG8tGHR1hmpfFb7UXcjUAPP8BACUQxjy+nZMaIBmycGZJqOhFuya 11Rw3pIfmAD+3z5Fe+7Ql9aPwfb3Gx2wLFwH4KzG8syD7jrw8euTohGTQtQiGYwJxZlf RAWbuz51ehbhLFgHCcUcDxADw4/kUk6RiUNmeOP4DplNBa5rFm4I0u5/IsZBMTRBpFXX NL2qNCYRcno+zWokfq8NAP1wXSvF6VjjRVmhXMEMcpon9GWIzqycN4qLpvHdiMev/Hl1 Y5tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705637884; x=1706242684; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=n9S6FGbSuezoG5x0B7lMC46YZ1wGfl4XA9Rhx3SZWY0=; b=bKl3sDiKbtWujz0VGMbrM0QuZOSoSbkduxLtLwvk12z+mPGAxDotkV89hCOpOqFD3E y9OY3s38UzZLSQIkxNELvIoceKx3b3LJMn/G9xbArEzuAYxOXEHA05Z6JLHwcW+hEhzP Sn6EChtQl8qk84zutqyXMle6DT5RRiH052l91z+DkPSaIcvaveX8pmze6hosRwCiUJNa G2Mn0+JvWUZCgcNQWrmtN7XJLgFTGdO7uSCnar9nO+6/ZJSttdqjdEFGyIVVAEK75GDU Ib9AT0bHxwtFgsrQcRyrUxRPyrGVP5bJbfEFHTYi9qDm7RG7ip8QyWN1ECZXiHInuAVj uHtA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwMxBomVWDxKr+rV3NKbtQrFkdH9mHzT/NTrppjsJKdp4pBHYOQ gTt0V60h8d6735QCU3ENx0+fge8nz53GL0dUP9KY8TeAkVhFoZaNk4FqwQ0hOo2eBvlaos150eX uGea2/H4UT34BjhiOunN+IY4cLvw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH+Wp340/49hjcpGHJ5ccrP3MOy/77xKhiQx8RfvMNGwq62e9RdzDAVCaLhyvhelNNzUo19lDlInyfMIAzFzXg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:248d:b0:a2c:c4b1:3fbd with SMTP id e13-20020a170906248d00b00a2cc4b13fbdmr628213ejb.2.1705637884326; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 20:18:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <170559100930.21281.8142882686300667918@ietfa.amsl.com> <d5d9e798-c6c1-4f15-a1f2-4e08580a70c4@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <d5d9e798-c6c1-4f15-a1f2-4e08580a70c4@mit.edu>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 20:17:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZUOepsqoGY+kb5tB8CBc=EOYAtoSXk35XAMD4LF5Hw8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-kitten-krb-spake-preauth@ietf.org, kitten-chairs@ietf.org, kitten@ietf.org, Nicolas Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000035f5d1060f44c4be"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/-hyUCBm7HLAjt1pRakyNx-cLVTo>
Subject: Re: [kitten] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-kitten-krb-spake-preauth-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 04:18:07 -0000

On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:15 AM Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 1/18/24 10:16, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker wrote:
> > In Section 12, we're telling the Designated Experts that an I-D counts
> as a
> > specification, even if it is never published as an RFC.  But an I-D can
> expire.
> >   Are we OK with having an IANA registry with an entry that claims as its
> > authoritative specification an expired I-D?
>
> I assume this comment is not intended to be actionable by the draft
> editors, as the situation will be rectified if the draft advances to
> RFC.


It's meant for the working group and its sponsoring AD to consider, but
it's no longer a blocking position.

>

> The IANA Kerberos preauthentication registry contains references
> to numerous expired drafts besides this one.
>

I think that's unfortunate, since the whole idea of having a specification
be required is that it needs to be relatively stable, and something that
has expired is, to me at least, not.

-MSK