IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] PKCROSS

Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> Fri, 12 July 2013 04:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rra@stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81BF11E81F7 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IAvagua-Zzf0 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (smtp3.Stanford.EDU [171.67.219.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D844611E80BA for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A041F45DC4B; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.67.225.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C90C045DC3E; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B4F532F4E6; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK3OfOg32kH62-Tr3yS+8VVhqagt8ibe6CWncx6dB61cDfhgiQ@mail.gmail.com> (Nico Williams's message of "Thu, 11 Jul 2013 23:06:35 -0500")
Organization: The Eyrie
References: <CAK3OfOj-g9WYcuLNk0bcWQ7TG3DLWJAnAPuDCKfSOZaF2YJZRA@mail.gmail.com> <3E0FEBD9-CCB8-4DE2-A967-5521F9DD6C89@jpl.nasa.gov> <CAK3OfOg32kH62-Tr3yS+8VVhqagt8ibe6CWncx6dB61cDfhgiQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:34:12 -0700
Message-ID: <87mwpsflbv.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] PKCROSS
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 04:34:19 -0000

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Henry B. Hotz <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>> On Jul 11, 2013, at 2:40 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

>>> I note this text in the current charter:

>>>  Prepare a standards-track protocol to solve the use cases addressed
>>>        by draft-hotz-kx509-01 including new support for digital
>>>        signatures.

>> Yeah, I really, really need to get back to this.

> Oh.  You were being sarcastic.  The RFC issued (and I missed that).  Har.

No, I don't think he was being sarcastic.  The RFC that was published
documents the existing protocol, which is kind of broken.  I'm pretty sure
this charter action is about *revising* that protocol and making it more
sane.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email