Re: [kitten] PKCROSS

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Fri, 12 July 2013 04:06 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB5711E80A2 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.227
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fiE4YbrVbOjs for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcahe.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9024E21F9AEE for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024B3B805B for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=cc0hGlYNfG0dUGIM98KQ t7pzkdE=; b=qKbKMDau+Iit6+zZBrZPyRz3m63QwlBoo7GmckLudslIDszexkaw 8N89Zp2WZ3pgmRfhwzqXGir86Cs5UYKHpNbXLwrqYrmfZpiSrKj9PQcoQ5EF6q50 7WOB6ceh0IJAW1WxgSLKZswkfQDYG06GB3z/NUNpnO3zqxixHeAaRpM=
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64453B800A for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c10so204983wiw.17 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OXx0ecRCL6Zm0h+tsSLm7e6ZxhitfGs5Dh9Cy1uQ9wE=; b=MjrVnAg1CioKbk/0coji/Hd1TJwEMSJXVTUiAZK5/TL1PaEq8jZOUkN6psfOtHcUUU As9VvXO/OOaGvky6llRt4n+K0CEKRaQ/uZVvM/v74gRFitFic2CE0EB8OhYEQlac+igU mqcHNOfqXMbk4+DA9jElnBCZDA4qqUk2RD8Md3fpaySEn6Az1lvYpdQGG7n0uFNnCvQw qlJgOWeUV8KyoWpNQxA0gia0m7WBWTmehSKWckkqLrHs/vccyyJf6ViF4DhO62xHFfDZ BH0ca0W0+s9YQqT5WEmDxmndD9ZC9BAeWvxF1W05mXgQHgVa09SXp3KUzvvKJldJ4gfB NPsQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.74.197 with SMTP id w5mr532796wiv.20.1373601995351; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.38.138 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3E0FEBD9-CCB8-4DE2-A967-5521F9DD6C89@jpl.nasa.gov>
References: <CAK3OfOj-g9WYcuLNk0bcWQ7TG3DLWJAnAPuDCKfSOZaF2YJZRA@mail.gmail.com> <3E0FEBD9-CCB8-4DE2-A967-5521F9DD6C89@jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 23:06:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOg32kH62-Tr3yS+8VVhqagt8ibe6CWncx6dB61cDfhgiQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] PKCROSS
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 04:06:43 -0000

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Henry B. Hotz <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2013, at 2:40 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
>
>> I note this text in the current charter:
>>
>>  Prepare a standards-track protocol to solve the use cases addressed
>>        by draft-hotz-kx509-01 including new support for digital
>>        signatures.
>
> Yeah, I really, really need to get back to this.

Oh.  You were being sarcastic.  The RFC issued (and I missed that).  Har.