IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: review of draft-wierenga-ietf-sasl-saml-00

"Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu> Wed, 26 May 2010 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cantor.2@osu.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AE33A697A for <kitten@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.550, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o0KLgtO5v8vc for <kitten@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from defang1.it.ohio-state.edu (defang1.it.ohio-state.edu [128.146.216.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB293A6998 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from defang10.it.ohio-state.edu (defang10.it.ohio-state.edu [128.146.216.79]) by defang1.it.ohio-state.edu (8.13.7/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o4QIhSEE028312; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:43:28 -0400
Received: from SNOWDOG (SNOWDOG.dyn.cio.osu.edu [164.107.161.86]) by defang10.it.ohio-state.edu (8.13.7/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o4QIhSa7015293; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:43:28 -0400
From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: 'Sam Hartman' <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, 'Klaas Wierenga' <klaas@cisco.com>
References: <tslzkzn67n5.fsf@mit.edu> <077001cafc4b$603f0510$20bd0f30$@osu.edu> <4BFD2ECE.5020600@cisco.com> <tslr5ky4iw5.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tslr5ky4iw5.fsf@mit.edu>
Subject: RE: review of draft-wierenga-ietf-sasl-saml-00
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:43:30 -0400
Organization: The Ohio State University
Message-ID: <082601cafd03$561cfcf0$0256f6d0$@osu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLRbl7pt5nj/GkkimyEmmW8RXcC0wEhdeLrAhdHfmYCW31CfpAqh8xw
Content-Language: en-us
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=128.146.216.79; country=US; region=OH; city=Columbus; latitude=39.9968; longitude=-82.9882; metrocode=535; areacode=614; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=39.9968,-82.9882&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.146.216.81
Cc: kitten@ietf.org, moonshot-community@jiscmail.ac.uk, draft-wierenga-ietf-sasl-saml@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 18:43:41 -0000

> I'm not actually sure 3 is possible: I'm not sure whether the return URL
> is covered by the signature.

The signature in a SAML redirect binding URL is over a defined set of
parameters in a particular order, and is not perturbed by additional
parameters (though of course they are not protected by it).

-- Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email