Re: [kitten] WGLC on draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness-06

Tom Yu <tlyu@mit.edu> Fri, 29 April 2016 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tlyu@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2538E12D0DD for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nVZ_lE16bTjz for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu [18.9.25.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3230A12D096 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1209190c-ed7ff70000001ce8-f9-5723bac6daff
Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id E8.D9.07400.6CAB3275; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:49:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id u3TJnQuA023866; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:49:26 -0400
Received: from localhost (sarnath.mit.edu [18.18.1.190]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tlyu@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id u3TJnOhU006514; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:49:25 -0400
From: Tom Yu <tlyu@mit.edu>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
References: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1604142308170.26829@multics.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:49:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1604142308170.26829@multics.mit.edu> (Benjamin Kaduk's message of "Thu, 14 Apr 2016 23:12:16 -0400")
Message-ID: <ldv1t5ofb5n.fsf@sarnath.mit.edu>
Lines: 6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrXtsl3K4waM3ehZHN69icWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxraz65kKvjJWLLwo2cB4nLGLkZNDQsBE4nfTXuYuRi4OIYE2 JonZu9vYIZyNjBKfGq5AOW8YJY6fXccC0sImIC1x/PIuJhBbREBJYvHZFjYQm1lAVOLcuiOs ILawgLNE68617CC2kICjxIN1a8F6WQRUJc7dmcIIMpRToIVR4mh3FzNIgldAV+LA9clgDTwC HBJd7xuZIOKCEidnPmGBWKAlcePfS6YJjPyzkKRmIUktYGRaxSibklulm5uYmVOcmqxbnJyY l5dapGuol5tZopeaUrqJERxmkjw7GM+88TrEKMDBqMTD++GBUrgQa2JZcWXuIUZJDiYlUd6K RcrhQnxJ+SmVGYnFGfFFpTmpxYcYJTiYlUR4v28HyvGmJFZWpRblw6SkOViUxHkL958OExJI TyxJzU5NLUgtgsnKcHAoSfAu2AnUKFiUmp5akZaZU4KQZuLgBBnOAzT8NUgNb3FBYm5xZjpE /hSjLseCH7fXMgmx5OXnpUqJ884CKRIAKcoozYObA04PQoz7XjGKA70lzDsTpIoHmFrgJr0C WsIEtERgkyLIkpJEhJRUA6OG+YbVZx78+nyIOaH/Xvnrno3MhzPYNBQnn1gY/KvMhG9Z8BrF 2HqHh++tH/Xnh7Gaz3prp3+V3TBEYd8D01ep9rt+eV8XZ/9pEHhmYZPXR7aJM6a5GG+9Ebvz UG3c91a/4oAageaSDocLPkxcybZXv8cn6dxcrf+tYP9U4QbR3Xx5P102MSuxFGckGmoxFxUn AgBpvr266gIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/JYrjicTYcb86MQQDHygmHVpxMFE>
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [kitten] WGLC on draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness-06
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 19:49:32 -0000

I've read the current and several previous revisions of this document.
The current revision seems reasonable to me, and I can find no obvious
substantive issues.  I agree with Greg's suggested changes for the minor
editorial issues.

-Tom